Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is worst for Fox?


koolkatluke

Recommended Posts

If Moore plays really well and we win a few more games, I think it's going to make Fox look even worse. Fox's actions up to this point indicate that he does not feel Moore is ready to be a starting QB in the NFL, so if Moore plays well then it demonstrates that Fox is a poor evaluator of talent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If fox can get this team to play hard.There is a slim chance he keeps his job.

gantt talks about this here

It's not much, but it's December, and the team is 4-7. It's actually interesting, from the standpoint of the narrative of the season, because even when the Panthers have been down they have been significant into Week 16 and 17. Not this year, and that's the first test of coach John Fox.

http://www.heraldonline.com/247/story/1781930.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Matt Moore = Dereck Anderson.

Moore will probably play semi-decent. They will rely heavily on the run game and just ask him to make simple throws to keep D's honest. Maybe stretch the field once or twice a game. The Panthers are liable to win 2 out of 4 games, mostly because I think NE's D is porous and Double Trouble will expose it.

Everyone is going to be excited that Moore doesn't look like complete poo and will want him re-signed. The only saving grace is that he is a RFA so hopefully we won't have to give him any real money. Next year he will get the start and we will suck because we have a shitty QB, hopefully McCown will still be here and we can fall back on him.

I'm not a Jake Delhomme apologist or supporter. He is done and the team needs to move on. I just don't think that Moore is worth a damn. The team needs to go in a completely different direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...