Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Receiver Tracking Metrics: DJ Moore


AlphabetsEnd
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, DJ feed me moore said:

he is sick of the bullshit, we have literally killed his love for the game. thanks Rhule!

If bad years kill your love for the game you never had any. Larry Fitzgerald played years and years with crappy QBs and still put up solid HOF numbers. Not once did that man coast and it's why he was fun to watch. You can literally see DJ give up on a play after a defender touches him. Coaches see that and when the new coach starts rebuilding the WRs DJ might not be there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, BrianS said:

For all the folks defending him, please rewatch the tape.  Getting open is a matter of high effort on every play, regardless if you are the intended target or not.  DJ is not doing that, and it's not the first time he's been lazy.

DJ has the ability to be Steve Smith.  But he's not playing NEARLY at the effort level of 89.  He's not even playing at the level he has shown in the past.

If we see these sorts of metrics, the coaching staff sees them.  And then it becomes a loop.  Staff sees he isn't getting open, they call fewer plays for him, so his effort goes down, and he gets open less, staff sees . . . etc. 

DJ can control one thing:  his effort.  It's currently not there and it's very fair to call it out, even when we like the player.

This. It's the funchess metric. Dude was a good WR but if he didn't get the ball it was coasting all game. I remember seeing a quote from a DB in the 90s and he said he would always know when the cowboys were running the ball because Irving wouldn't Velcro his gloves together because he knew he wasn't getting the ball. This is the same for DJ Moore. The reason the Ball is going to CMC way too much is because DJ isn't getting open and doing his job. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No one's saying LaMelo has no blame we're responding to you acting like he's the reason they lost. The scapegoating and blaming the teams woes on his personality is where it's like Cam Newton all over again. It was a failure on multiple fronts and primarily Lee's. Dude said ON AIR pregame that they had to protect the paint and if that was his gameplan going in he couldn't have botched it more. As the commentators said Ball's a rhythm guy and Orlando was preventing him for getting any kind of flow going. I'm a normie watching on TV and said they needed to bait them into fouling to combat that. They didn't even try until the 2nd half when it was too late. I think it's fair to expect the star to overcome whatever but LaMelo was not the problem in that game and he's not what is holding the team back. He's the only reason they're flirting with being a great team. I kinda put the center play on Lee too. Moose is great until he's up against a big who can body him. We've always known that and that's what Kalkbrenner is for. I don't know if it would have changed much but Kalkbrenner should have had more minutes than him.  And moving forward with the center position, I just think it's the time to trade Diabate while his stock's high and that's not an indictment of his game. He's like an evolved combination of Biyombo and PJ. He's a great rim protector and the strength issue is just what you're going to have to deal with if you want that. But Kalkbrenner is perfectly capable of protecting the rim and we gotta get away from the undersized centers or it'll always be a problem for us.
    • Honestly its why that Jalen Coker grab was a big deal.  I'd been warming up to the idea of a sadiq pick and was adamantly against a receiver...but this altered my train of thought.  I mean For instance, Cade Otton signed for 3 yr 30 mil contract...thats not dramatically different than the rookie payscale for #19 (4 year 20 mil with 5th year option), however you KNOW otton is decent...no clue if Sadiq will be anything. 
×
×
  • Create New...