Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

overlooked amoung the fox/moore/delhomme drama...kasay to kick a milestone


Recommended Posts

I would be happy for him, but there will always be a cold dark space of rage toward him for costing us SB 38.

that's a myth. you could just as easily blame the defense for allowing 29 points and 450 yards of offense up to that point. or the offense for failing to convert on several critical first downs that would've put carolina up.

Kasay might have been the most visible cause, but to blame it on him is beyond absurd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's a myth. you could just as easily blame the defense for allowing 29 points and 450 yards of offense up to that point. or the offense for failing to convert on several critical first downs that would've put carolina up.

Kasay might have been the most visible cause, but to blame it on him is beyond absurd.

its not absurd. After we had just come back to take the lead, he gave the Patriots a short field. We played reasonable D the whole game. Sure its not ALL his fault. But he gets plenty of blame for botching that kick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not absurd. After we had just come back to take the lead, he gave the Patriots a short field. We played reasonable D the whole game. Sure its not ALL his fault. But he gets plenty of blame for botching that kick.

allowing 481 yards of offense is not reasonable D.

I agree that he deserves blame for kicking it out of bounds... a bad play is a bad play. but people pin entirely too much of that loss on him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

allowing 481 yards of offense is not reasonable D.

I agree that he deserves blame for kicking it out of bounds... a bad play is a bad play. but people pin entirely too much of that loss on him.

thats becuase he had 1 simple job to do. We had the lead. 1 small mistake near the end of the game. how many teams can beat Brady with a short field? not many

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its not absurd. After we had just come back to take the lead, he gave the Patriots a short field. We played reasonable D the whole game. Sure its not ALL his fault. But he gets plenty of blame for botching that kick.

Their last four drives consisted of them slicing thru our defense like a hot knife thru butter. We managed to get an interception once, but other than that, neither defense played well for the entire fourth quarter.

Fwiw, I felt we were doomed when the Patriots got the ball with over a minute left. We would not have stopped them no matter where they got the ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their last four drives consisted of them slicing thru our defense like a hot knife thru butter. We managed to get an interception once, but other than that, neither defense played well for the entire fourth quarter.

Fwiw, I felt we were doomed when the Patriots got the ball with over a minute left.

fine i screwed up. point is. Give Brady the ball at the 40 with a minute and change left-- huge disadvantage. odds would have been in our favor had he had the whole field to work with

Link to comment
Share on other sites

this.

as excited as i was about the panthers being in the lead, waaaay too much time on the clock was the only thing going thru my mind.

Jake called a timeout right before he threw the TD pass to Proehl. I remember thinking at that moment that calling the timeout was a mistake. Best to let some time run off the clock, then call it. IMO, that hurt us worse than Kasay's kickoff. But the biggest mistake was going for 2 so early. It put us in a hole that we never got out of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...