Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Charlotte milfs get ready!


 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Peon Awesome said:

Did you not click on the links I posted and scroll through the first page where multiple people say they want us to trade up for him or do you have problems with basic reading comprehension?

Oh, what happen to "multiple firsts"? Don't make up some silly poo and then shocked when you're called out on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Oh, what happen to "multiple firsts"? Don't make up some silly poo and then shocked when you're called out on it.

I dont know how to quote tweet from other threads but copying and pasting from the 2nd link:

Same. If we can’t get Watson for three firsts and a couple players, then I’d love to try to use two firsts (and a couple players if necessary) to move up for Wilson

From the 3rd link:

personally I feel like we should be all in for the #2 pick like we were 5 mins ago for Watson.. Whatever it takes ... 

How much are we willing to give up for #2 pick in the draft?  

Tough question but I’d be willing to trade #8, #39, future 1st for the number #2 pick

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/18/2021 at 11:26 AM, Leotiger said:

 Unfortunately with the legal battles ahead for Watson we need to focus towards the draft for a impacting QB

image.jpeg.dbc57552678cf6b328b4a3afd5a3a88c.jpeg

I think his pro day will tell how interested we are in him 

personally I feel like we should be all in for the #2 pick like we were 5 mins ago for Watson.. Whatever it takes ... 

How many personnel will be at this pro day for Carolina ?
Hoping they come in deep like they did for Trey Lance 

 

How much are we willing to give up for #2 pick in the draft?  

Tough question but I’d be willing to trade #8, #39, future 1st for the number #2 pick ... 

 

On 3/1/2021 at 1:44 PM, JawnyBlaze said:

Same. If we can’t get Watson for three firsts and a couple players, then I’d love to try to use two firsts (and a couple players if necessary) to move up for Wilson

 

10 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Oh, what happen to "multiple firsts"? Don't make up some silly poo and then shocked when you're called out on it.

There you go dumb dumb, that was after 10 seconds of scrolling through the threads he linked.  You now gonna ask for video evidence of a table physically being slammed or what?

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a thread about a mock draft specifically revolving around us moving up to #2 overall to take Zach Wilson, giving up multiple 1sts and 3rds.  Many people were on board with it.

If you're disputing that people were losing their minds in here over Zach Wilson leading up to the 2021 draft, you're either being dishonest or your memory is quite poor.  Lots of Zach Wilson boners.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh poo, you've found two guys. Thanks for posting the receipts. One is doing a mock, and the other is making an off-hand comment about how if we're going to do something insane like trade for Deshaun Watson they would rather do something adjacently insane instead — trading for Wilson. Really, POUNDING THE TABLE! 

The intent of his post was dismissing the idea of getting a better draft pick for long term building of the team, instead of short-term wins. Someone could easily point out the Bengals as a counter, if we're doing silly anecdotes.

In other words. Some huddle poo.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peon Awesome said:

The irony of this thread is that Wilson was the 2nd overall pick and the same guy multiple posters were slamming the table for us to trade multiple 1sts to move up and draft. It's almost like sucking into the consensus #2 rookie qb prospect isn't necessarily a surefire strategy. And yet one too many posters are getting pissed we're not doing that. 

I mean I wouldn't care if we whiffed on Zack Wilsion, because at least we fugin' tried then, we need to draft a QB.

But yeah lmao Mac Jones is better than him. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, MasterAwesome said:

Here's a thread about a mock draft specifically revolving around us moving up to #2 overall to take Zach Wilson, giving up multiple 1sts and 3rds.  Many people were on board with it.

If you're disputing that people were losing their minds in here over Zach Wilson leading up to the 2021 draft, you're either being dishonest or your memory is quite poor.  Lots of Zach Wilson boners.

I'm disputing it. I don't care about a minority of posters making off-hand comments, and mocks that some posters make every week for their own entertainment. Show me were there are multiple posters "banging the table" to trade multiple firsts for Wilson. This wasn't some contingency.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Rags said:

I mean I wouldn't care if we whiffed on Zack Wilsion, because at least we fugin' tried then, we need to draft a QB.

But yeah lmao Mac Jones is better than him. 

Its near impossible to get people to understand were these rookie land, is just as important. 

Chiefs I think were in the AFC championship game and traded up for Malhomey..... to pair with the best QB coach in NFL history.....that was like winning the mega billions lotto....

Ive said this plenty too- zack is a poor big city/NYC fit.....member when Brent "scum" Farve when to NYC jets and blew cheeks??? The following season he landed on the viking and looked like a MVP while aging.... 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

Its near impossible to get people to understand were these rookie land, is just as important. 

Chiefs I think were in the AFC championship game and traded up for Malhomey..... to pair with the best QB coach in NFL history.....that was like winning the mega billions lotto....

Ive said this plenty too- zack is a poor big city/NYC fit.....member when Brent "scum" Farve when to NYC jets and blew cheeks??? The following season he landed on the viking and looked like a MVP while aging.... 

The entire Jets team is fine. This is actually a GREAT Jets team, and Zack has been playing like crap. Yeah he's young, but he's making terrible, TERRIBLE mistakes. 

Zack just isn't good right now and the team expects more from him.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sometimes you get very valuable information from fantasy football sites. I found an analysis that you may want to read from The Fantasy Footballers. Perhaps you'll gain an insight as to why we moved up and got him. As always, here are a few snippets: "As expected, he dominated in the 2023 season. He averaged an impressive 2.03 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play, which ranks in the 86th percentile among all junior seasons since 2013." "Naturally, after initially playing behind two NFL-caliber running backs, Brooks’ career numbers do not jump off the page. However, his 2023 campaign gave us a glimpse of just how massive his upside could be at the next level. In fact, Brooks is one of only TWO running backs in this class to exceed 2.00 Scrimmage Yards per Team Play within their first three seasons in college."  "If you watch Jonathon Brooks’ film, you will find multiple plays in which he created yardage with his quick feet and lateral agility. He is elusive in open spaces and has an impressive ability to stack multiple cuts to avoid contact. Combined with his impressive burst and acceleration, Brooks can be a matchup nightmare in the second and third levels of the defense." "While Brooks is not the most physical running back, he does have a knack for absorbing contact and bouncing off defenders. You see this time and time again in his film." "He showcased a willingness to initiate contact with the pass rusher, the strength to maintain blocks, and the quickness to adjust to the defender’s moves. In addition, per PFF, Brooks was a top-three running back in the 2024 class in pass-blocking grade last season. He was also one of only two running backs in the class to average a 0% pass block pressure rate, highlighting just how effective he was as a blocker." "In short, Brooks has tremendous upside as a prospect. Even with his ACL injury, I would still be comfortable drafting him in the early second round of rookie drafts. In fact, I would not be shocked if he finished his career as the most productive running back in this class. However, we just need to temper our expectations for his rookie year as he slowly ramps up to full health." Marvin Elequin provides more here (including video clips): https://www.thefantasyfootballers.com/dynasty/2024-rookie-profile-rb-jonathon-brooks-fantasy-football/   Basically, Brooks has the potential to be a beast, and was well worth the 46th pick (and most mocks had him going mid second round anyway). He's not JAG. Someone had to make the move and take him, and we were the ones to do it. He's elusive, has good speed and acceleration, exceptional contact balance, and is an outstanding blocker. Just like any nice RB transitioning to the league, he will need to get used to taking what the defense gives him, while also showing discriminating patience, but he has demonstrated some ability on that front in college. Brooks' only real knock is the ACL. But ACLs aren't career ending anymore, or even skill ending as evidenced by Dalvin Cook, Todd Gurley and others. We'll just need to temper our expectations during his rookie campaign while he gets back to form. Once he does, we'll finally have the talented three-down back that has eluded us since Stew retired.
    • https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619 https://jciodev.microsoftcrmportals.com/forums/general-discussion/3160889e-fd05-ef11-a81c-6045bd0b2619
    • 2.43 : Jackson Powers-Johnson, C, Oregon 2.52 : Adonai Mitchell, WR, Texas 3.65 : Junior Colson, LB, Michigan 3.79 : Blake Corum, RB, Michigan 4.101 : Ja'Tavion Sanders, TE, Texas 😎 5.141 : Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, C, Georgia 5.142 : Austin Booker, Edge, Kansas 5.155 : Christian Jones, OT, Texas Note, I traded down from 33 (took the Arizona/Atlanta trade up to 35 - might have actually been able to net an even better deal but whatever, I'll go with this). Took the Rams trade but stayed put at 52 and at the top of the 3rd.
×
×
  • Create New...