Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Blues 7pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

47 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

Not to mention the 16 shots the Blues got in the 3rd period alone. Anderson stood on his head tonight, otherwise this is a different game.

I watched the third all the way through last night(yay 7PM games), and I didn’t even feel like they had 16 SOG’s, we definitely were in control. Andersen getting some work in is good to see too. I’ll have to look up and see how many high dangers they had last night. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Harbingers said:

I watched the third all the way through last night(yay 7PM games), and I didn’t even feel like they had 16 SOG’s, we definitely were in control. Andersen getting some work in is good to see too. I’ll have to look up and see how many high dangers they had last night. 

After the 2nd, St. Louis had 23 shot attempts and 20 of those were SOG. Conversely, the Canes had 46 shot attempts and 30 on goal thru the second.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am high, but that’s besides the point! The blue line is not good right now. I’ve said it all year. I don’t think this group meshes well. Slaven has been just OK Niki up and down Miller up and down ghost and Walker have been your most consistent guys. Maybe it comes together more towards the playoffs
    • I was expecting to see more cap room moves by now, which may be to suggest that we are not going to be that aggressive.  I have mixed emotions about that (because I think we have 3 needs on D and 3 needs on O--starters).  If you look to the draft for 3 starters, that is ambitious.  We need 6
    • Yeah we shouldn’t be competing with teams, bidding wise, to sign a WR. There will be one for us and our budget.  I keep saying, how many balls will there be to go around anyway? One thing good I will say for this offense is the ball has been spread around at times. Seems like I remember seeing a large number of guys have caught passes in a game. Or been targeted at least. 3 RBs 4 or 5 WRs 2-3 TEs type of stat lines. 10-11 guys.  Not every week but that happens.    As far as WR in general, we need the smaller agile and quicker component to compliment what is there. After that it should be about depth, having good backups for the starters so we can run things consistently still, if a guy is out for a week or two. That is especially important in game where you have to finish the game with who you made active. 
×
×
  • Create New...