Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Verge's 2023 Draft general


Verge
 Share

Recommended Posts

You know, I do not mind a solid, impersonal debate to share views.  However, some of you attack the person when they put their necks out there to demonstrate their views at the time.  It seems that the people who never promote an original idea are the first to attack.  This is not referring to one person or instance, but in general.  No offense to Verge, but it takes some balls to share speculative theories based on whispers and innuendos, but some of you concrete operational literalists cannot handle any views that oppose your own.  Sad. But to go back and post things that were shared in a speculative forum from last year to attempt to discredit someone is beyond pathetic.  Stick your neck out--let's see those jelly beans you call balls doing something other than criticizing others behind a fake name on an internet forum. 

And I am not upset--this is just an observation after having read this thread. If you think your remarkable vision of the past is impressive and that your insult slinging is self-promoting, you need to ask others how it really makes you look.  You will not like the honest responses.  Again, not upset, angry, or anything other than a bit disgusted by the cowardice and cyber bullying that seems to be the MO of some Huddlers.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/4/2023 at 9:02 AM, MHS831 said:

You know, I do not mind a solid, impersonal debate to share views.  However, some of you attack the person when they put their necks out there to demonstrate their views at the time.  It seems that the people who never promote an original idea are the first to attack.  This is not referring to one person or instance, but in general.  No offense to Verge, but it takes some balls to share speculative theories based on whispers and innuendos, but some of you concrete operational literalists cannot handle any views that oppose your own.  Sad. But to go back and post things that were shared in a speculative forum from last year to attempt to discredit someone is beyond pathetic.  Stick your neck out--let's see those jelly beans you call balls doing something other than criticizing others behind a fake name on an internet forum. 

And I am not upset--this is just an observation after having read this thread. If you think your remarkable vision of the past is impressive and that your insult slinging is self-promoting, you need to ask others how it really makes you look.  You will not like the honest responses.  Again, not upset, angry, or anything other than a bit disgusted by the cowardice and cyber bullying that seems to be the MO of some Huddlers.

Welcome to the Keyboard Warrior generation.  

It’s not like it was in my time when you had to weigh what you said with the probably of getting a bloody nose. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
    • We clearly need to add a veteran stopgap at safety one way or the other.
    • On Panther's Wire too. No idea, just found it and trying to share. https://pantherswire.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/panthers/2025/06/15/nfl-free-agency-rumors-panthers-eagles-justin-simmons/84219881007/
×
×
  • Create New...