Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Simms top QB prospects

NAS

By NAS,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
21 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Simms is just a hot take artist. He had Zach Wilson over Lawrence. Mac Jones and Kellen Mond of all people over Justin Fields

 

Zach Wilson was an absolutely horrible pick. Mac Jones turned out to be a baller. Justin has yet to put it together although he hasn't had a receiver like DJ in his time with da Bears.

Matt Corral?!? Ohio State recruited BOTH Corral and Stroud. Blue chips. Our QB room could be sneaky GREAT.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Zach Wilson was an absolutely horrible pick. Mac Jones turned out to be a baller. Justin has yet to put it together although he hasn't had a receiver like DJ in his time with da Bears.

Matt Corral?!? Ohio State recruited BOTH Corral and Stroud. Blue chips. Our QB room could be sneaky GREAT.

Mac Jones turned out to be a baller? What kind of alternate universe is this? Mac Jones got outplayed by Bailey Zappe last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

1. STROUD

2. Levis

3.Young/Richardson

 

Stroud is obvious. Again Levis over Young because of equal arm talent size, weight, physicality advantage at the next level, NFL body.

To ME the real mystery for NFL teams is who will be better between Young and Richardson, equally talented in their own ways but BOTH bigger risks than STROUD or Levis imo.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samppson Collaborator

Samppson

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Mac is still better than anybody who played QB for us last season. He got hurt iirc.

I live in New England, he did initially get injured but was ready to go back and they stuck with Zappe as he was playing better than Mac did even uninjured. 

Mac Jones or Jag Jones is pedestrian, the general sense up here is hes probably not the long term answer, getting him some weapons this year and seeing how it goes, but I wouldnt be surprised to see them swing by on a QB coming up, Belichick is getting older, cant imagine he wants to draft another rookie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted

Are they going to let Anthony Richardson play QB and run over or past defenders in the open field.

The answer for Cam was YES but if you take that advantage we'll equalize by letting defenders t off on your head 1985 style...ask Jim McMahon.

Cam rules were just for Cam and no other QB and it was BLATANT and even acknowledged by in "your not old enough to get that call".

If Anthony Richardson isn't allowed to fully use his advantages he's a liability.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Samppson said:

I live in New England, he did initially get injured but was ready to go back and they stuck with Zappe as he was playing better than Mac did even uninjured. 

Mac Jones or Jag Jones is pedestrian, the general sense up here is hes probably not the long term answer, getting him some weapons this year and seeing how it goes, but I wouldnt be surprised to see them swing by on a QB coming up, Belichick is getting older, cant imagine he wants to draft another rookie.

Mac is a good system guy. If he went to a Belichick protegee he'd be just a productive. Mac has the will and determination much like Dan Jones, he will get better every year.

Zappe? I don't know. There was more NFL tape out on Mac and what to do with him than Bailey. Surprise QBs only last but for so long because they game plan against what you do best.

Mac has already over come that to a point of consistency. Bailey looks good but ask Kyle Allen about that, it gets harder the farther you go in the NFL until you perfect your individual game to make it flexible when they try to take away your strengths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samppson Collaborator

Samppson

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

Mac is a good system guy. If he went to a Belichick protegee he'd be just a productive. Mac has the will and determination much like Dan Jones, he will get better every year.

Zappe? I don't know. There was more NFL tape out on Mac and what to do with him than Bailey. Surprise QBs only last but for so long because they game plan against what you do best.

Mac has already over come that to a point of consistency. Bailey looks good but ask Kyle Allen about that, it gets harder the farther you go in the NFL until you perfect your individual game to make it flexible when they try to take away your strengths.

The problem is, "system" guys don't win championships in the modern NFL. Gone are the days of a Mac Jones level of player winning a superbowl, outside of having some generational type defense like the Seahawks, and even then it was a short run. You need a superstar who can take over games, Mac Jones will never be that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Samppson said:

The problem is, "system" guys don't win championships in the modern NFL. Gone are the days of a Mac Jones level of player winning a superbowl, outside of having some generational type defense like the Seahawks, and even then it was a short run. You need a superstar who can take over games, Mac Jones will never be that.

Mac Jones can take over games putting balls in the hands of running men. Not his fault New England as a franchise has wound down into limp mode having ejected most of their weapons long ago. Yep, you got the rings though. 

YOU do OWE us that 2003 ring for that underhanded spygate poo. Had that not happened your bums would have lost to the best team in the NFL that year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Samppson Collaborator

Samppson

Posted
Posted
Just now, rippadonn said:

Mac Jones can take over games putting balls in the hands of running men. Not his fault New England as a franchise has wound down into limp mode having ejected most of their weapons long ago. Yep, you got the rings though. 

YOU do OWE us that 2003 ring for that underhanded spygate poo. Had that not happened your bums would have lost to the best team in the NFL that year.

Lol I said I lived in New England, not that I am a fan lol. I hate Patriot fans, I have to listen to them all the time.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...