Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Just for the sake of discussion, is there a correlation between size and injury?


rayzor
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah to me height/overall size is more important than weight. 

Yeah as I said somewhere else i'm suprised with the "I'm not worried about his height, i'm worried about his weight" crowd. Feel like his height is something that everyone should worry about a bit when factoring in his profile.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ECHornet said:

Correct and OP even stated as much. Even the article addressed that more research in that area was needed. That doesn't mean evidence exists that smaller QBs are at more risk. I think the obvious conclusion is QBs of all sizes have a risk of injury, and size, history, decision making, and chance will decide their fate. How heavily you weigh each of those factors determines which side of this argument you're on.

No this data shows that smaller QBs won't be as successful in the NFL.  That a player of Young's size will be less accurate and throw less TDs than a player 6'2" or taller.  This is all about relating physical data to QB success right?  Or does it only count when he helps the particular player you are wanting?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, stan786 said:

You are telling me bigger guys are more resistant but then i'm showing you an example of a guy who is big and had the same thing happen. Stroud's extra 2 inches make that impossible though?
 

If we need a big framed guy why arent we arguing for Levis or Richardson. Stroud is closer to the Bridgewater Tua mold than he is to a big bodied QB.

Richardson is surely in the discussion with his size and arm strength as is Levis. I agree that Stroud is not as big as you would like but he seems to have a bigger frame to build upon. I would feel much better if he were a little bit meatier. That again is what bothers me about Young. He is small, has a slight frame isn't likely to stack much more muscle which protects guys from injury. The fact that Stroud isn't that much bigger doesn't suggest we should go even smaller with Young as much as a guy like Stroud is likely the minimum we want to play with if we want to use the qb in the running game at all.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, stan786 said:

Because they generally arent good enough to avoid the position swap that happens to guys that are athletic or small and aren't developing at the right pace. Its like what used to happen to more mobile QBs, and happens with Bigger Athletic QBs. There is a prototype for sure in the NFL and Bryce is an outlier for that, i dont imagine anyone is denying that.

ec clearly is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

No this data shows that smaller QBs won't be as successful in the NFL.  That a player of Young's size will be less accurate and throw less TDs than a player 6'2" or taller.  This is all about relating physical data to QB success right?  Or does it only count when he helps the particular player you are wanting?

I'd say that in 2009 when this was published that was probably more true than now, things like the fact most short QBs were probably backup level at best and whatnot. But I'd love to see some more data on all this, its just interesting stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

He was likely one of the smallest in college too, right? Hold on a sec while I go google how that worked out for him.

Eric Crouch, Baker Mayfield, Johnny Manziel, and Troy Smith all crushed it as undersized college QBs.  How did that work out for them?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, panthers55 said:

Richardson is surely in the discussion with his size and arm strength as is Levis. I agree that Stroud is not as big as you would like but he seems to have a bigger frame to build upon. I would feel much better if he were a little bit meatier. That again is what bothers me about Young. He is small, has a slight frame isn't likely to stack much more muscle which protects guys from injury. The fact that Stroud isn't that much bigger doesn't suggest we should go even smaller with Young as much as a guy like Stroud is likely the minimum we want to play with if we want to use the qb in the running game at all.

Thats fair, I just think Stroud probably doesnt get used much in the running game either with his athletic profile, and build. I dont think anyone is going to be very worried about defending any designed QB run with Bryce or Stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

No this data shows that smaller QBs won't be as successful in the NFL.  That a player of Young's size will be less accurate and throw less TDs than a player 6'2" or taller.  This is all about relating physical data to QB success right?  Or does it only count when he helps the particular player you are wanting?

My comment was directed to this from you:

"Again most QBs are going to fall into the 6'2" and over group so I think the data is going to be heavily skewed."

I was agreeing that the data is skewed. Now you don't want it to be for this article? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Eric Crouch, Baker Mayfield, Johnny Manziel, and Troy Smith all crushed it as undersized college QBs.  How did that work out for them?

Matt lienart, Marcus Mariota, The Golden Calf of Bristol, Sam Bradford, Jameis Winston on the other side. Plenty of NFL meh on all sides of this argument.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Eric Crouch, Baker Mayfield, Johnny Manziel, and Troy Smith all crushed it as undersized college QBs.  How did that work out for them?

He is failing to understand that at the lower levels guys his size are not giving the opportunity to play qb due to injury concerns.  Its just universal accepted that you need to be bigger to play the position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ECHornet said:

My comment was directed to this from you:

"Again most QBs are going to fall into the 6'2" and over group so I think the data is going to be heavily skewed."

I was agreeing that the data is skewed. Now you don't want it to be for this article? 

Most QBs fall into a certain height/weight range.  So looking at previous data (especially when dealing with one as unique as Young) seems pointless to me.  My point is if we want to review this OP's data and claim Young will be healthy I can pull other data showing he will suck.  Too many variables like how good was the OL, What kind of offense did they run, what was the injury etc...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rightturn said:

He is failing to understand that at the lower levels guys his size are not giving the opportunity to play qb due to injury concerns.  Its just universal accepted that you need to be bigger to play the position.

Why do you assume injury concerns? There is plenty of reasons besides injuries that lead to the bigger Prototype in the NFL being the go to. Passing windows and Pro style offenses operating with shorter drops making it harder for small qbs to see the field. Tendancy for smaller QBs to have weaker arms because they cant get the same torque on the ball. Smaller players tending to be more athletic allowing them to move to other positions and still play.

Most of this gets decided even before college really, there are plenty of examples of small college qbs holding up just fine, but in general the Football mentality is what it is. And end of day it makes sense that smaller QBs with generally smaller hands and less body mass arent going to throw the ball as well as these prototypes.

Doesnt mean there cant be outliers.

Edited by stan786
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
    • I dont know. He seems like a bigger douche now than ever. I didnt hate him for being a great player.
×
×
  • Create New...