Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WR in draft


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, mickeye76 said:

Unless the talent at 39 is just that special. Like. O Cyrus, Jack Campbell, Zay, BJ etc we could likely trade.  45 to 65 is a sneaky area that could be prime spot to add two valuable players instead of just one at 39.  

I think we could move back 10 spots or so if the price is right. We don't need a bunch of late rounders. I'm not seeing anyone with that capital to get 2 second rounders as is but I wouldn't be opposed to trading back and then trading back up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless they trade back, it is going to be an Edge. 

schooled tim meadows GIF by Sony Pictures Television

 

Disclaimer: Unless it's not.  I give edge a 50% chance, CB and G each 20% chances.  I see no WR who will be there at 39 much better than what is already on the roster now.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MHS831 said:

Unless they trade back, it is going to be an Edge. 

schooled tim meadows GIF by Sony Pictures Television

 

Disclaimer: Unless it's not.  I give edge a 50% chance, CB and G each 20% chances.  I see no WR who will be there at 39 much better than what is already on the roster now.

I was thinking the same.  Just ran a mock and the offensive talent available at 39 was crazy. Mayer, Washington, Kincaid, Zay, O Cyrus, and Gibbs all there.  Crazy.  I don't see that many dropping.  Instead of a run of defense that obviously happened in this mock or a run on offense that dwindles this enticing group.  I think it will be a 60/40 split.  Leaning towards mostly offense. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We won 5 with the worst defense in the history of defenses.  I think free agency and our draft puts us over 6.5.
    • Leaning towards just ordering this tonight, but now I have no idea on size. Has anyone bought a bunch of jerseys in the last few years and can convey how the Game vs Limited vs Reebok versions all fit? These are both Mediums... The white one here is a Reebok one from 2010, and was when they had the "+2 length" on the tag and it was the version with the stitched numbers instead of iron on... the blue one is from 2022 and is the F.U.S.E Limited version also with stitched stuff, not the "game jersey" with the ironed on numbers/letters that they have the T-Mac jerseys in. The old one fits me fine, the blue one was always a tad snug on me, particularly in the shoulders I'm leaning going with a Large based on the CMC, but for all I know, that is made with a tighter cut due to the higher "limited" level and the "game" ones they have for T-Mac are cut more like a T-Shirt and thus will fit more like the old white one I have here, not sure. (and yes, I already tried going to a sporting goods store here to hopefully try on a Lions jersey to see, but they don't have any right now)
    • I think there's a ton of potential in that WR room. But they really are unproven right now. Hopefully they live up to the hype.
×
×
  • Create New...