Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which Top QB better fits the new OC play calling style..


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, CamTheMan said:

I love how intelligent is and I don’t think he’ll completely bust because of that intelligence but his physical limitations exist and I don’t get why they’re so ignored just because he’s fun to watch.

Side note, but why take the player with such physical limitations and arguably the lowest ceiling out of all the top 4 quarterbacks when we were so aggressive in our staff hires? We have all the pieces in place to groom a quarterback with mental and mechanical holes in their game but there are no fixes to being small with a middle of the pack arm. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamTheMan said:

Side note, but why take the player with such physical limitations and arguably the lowest ceiling out of all the top 4 quarterbacks when we were so aggressive in our staff hires? We have all the pieces in place to groom a quarterback with mental and mechanical holes in their game but there are no fixes to being small with a middle of the pack arm. 

Exactly. You have to devote all your energy to designing the playbook around his physical limitations, that's not why you put together a staff like this. No QB sneaks, no 60+ yard bombs to keep the secondary on their toes, possibly no play action under center. Cardinals fans have been bitching for 3 years now how Kyler is still in shotgun on 4th and inches/goal line

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

A team I played in High School dominated for decades because they feed their kids steroid meat. They were always bigger/faster than the competition. Small school but they stay producing NFL talent.

 

It's the meat!

 

 

So they ate Mondo Burgers? 🤔

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Believe what you want.

 

When you see these superfreak athletes that's 180 pounds but benching 350 just know it's the meat.

 

Those powerhouse high school football progams have been doing this for decades. My cousin played for one of those schools. He was 175 pounds benching 350 which was more than anyone on our team at the time. Mind you I was a starting RB at my school 5'11 215 and my max was 280 my senior year. This is not normal!

Al bundy

Edited by mrcompletely11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, poundaway said:

It would explain why the mods let that set of PanthersBlahBlahBlah### accounts run around with impunity.

How are you any better exactly? Last night and tonight you've been slinking around old Bryce Young threads spammng poo reactions. The truth of the matter is you are as bad or worse than any of the so called trolls you complain about. Look in the mirror.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CamTheMan said:

Side note, but why take the player with such physical limitations and arguably the lowest ceiling out of all the top 4 quarterbacks when we were so aggressive in our staff hires? We have all the pieces in place to groom a quarterback with mental and mechanical holes in their game but there are no fixes to being small with a middle of the pack arm. 

Happy Lets Go GIF by Carolina Panthers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So why is CJ the "safe" pick when he needs coaching to reach his full potential. Bryce is an easy pick for Texans/rhule type team that needs someone that needs less coaching but a lower ceiling physically. 100% CJ is > 100% Bryce and Tepper just spent unknown amounts of money on this coaching staff to get the best out of a ball of clay. If we naturally sucked into the top pick and Wilks was still the HC I'd get the Bryce pick but it's not making sense in this scenario to me

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

This wasn't even on my watchlist but this could be what we see each game, bland and unexciting when the game plan goes bad

 

Not a good look in that game and tons of bad gameplay. Auburn looked like they were dominating Bama big time. Young was telegraphing many of his passes and was predictable.

Edited by PantherOnTheProwl1523
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Sacked 27 times in 2021. Not a good look in that game and tons of bad gameplay.

D-line guys just pushing him onto the ground with one hand...No "injury" but it limits the playbook so much. That first half will be every NFL regular season game the way teams will game plan for him

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you are an athlete or former athlete (myself?  Cornhole 2021-present; Disc Golf 2013-got a mega blister and had to retire; speed walking--every black Friday at Walmart 2003-2009) you know what it is to lose confidence.  Self-inflicted or not (in my view, a lot of 2023 was coaching and a lot of 2024 was confidence), he has confidence now. How fragile is it?  I think the light is on, the game slowed down, and he is ready to do his thing.  He seems to be "mobile in the pocket" instead of "running scared."   Last year, there were times when AT was out, Johnson gone, and all he really had was XL and Coker--a raw rookie with upside and an UDFA rookie.  TE was rarely a viable option. It reminded me of Benjamin and Funchess.   Moore had to step up.  This season, Bryce has weapons.  I expect XL to improve.  I expect TMac to help tremendously, and I think Coker will be solid.  Renfrow?  Horn?  bonuses.    
    • His points are valid.  However, it seems a bit based on past performance and fails to take into consideration trends and conditions that might suggest growth in 2025.   For one, he breaks the team down by position and ranks them separately.  I guess that is a fair way to do it, but they are dependent upon each other. Last year, our DL sucked.  That impacts the rest of the defense.  With no internal pressure, the QBs simply step up to avoid the Edge rush.  I would have suggested that the internal DL is now featuring pass rushers and large people who can collapse the pocket.  Secondly, the LBs were not protected very well in 2024.  It is hard to see the holes and step up when a guard is in your earhole a second after the snap.  Finally, the defensive backs will be forced to make fewer tackles and they will be better in pass protection with a new and improved DL.    Canales made an interesting comment the other day, and I (from the outside looking in) feel the same way:  (paraphrasing) "I have never seen a better group of rookies."   I think the biggest concern is the learning curve.  How long before these rookies are ready?   I am bullish on this team.  I think they win 3 of their first 4 and get confident.  The get the fans behind them.  From there, they win 6 of the remaining 13.  If they stay injury free, they have an outside shot at the NFC south.     
    • Biiiiiig eyeroll on this.  First, Look at historical stats of the most recent historical great DBs.  I plucked 3, Revis, Sherman, and Norman (cuzz he was our guy).  Combined post age 30, there are TWO pro bowls between those 3 and wanna get this...ZERO seasons with 16 games started.  ALL missed time.  It is RARE that Corners survive that long in the NFL and its about time we started recognizing this fact.  Jaycee is a good bet because it hasnt been anything seriously devastating injury wise, and with his sample size he could and should be an incredible piece for the panthers through age 30. Jaire kinda flops on the other side, hes 28...so hes under 30, but he wants his payday before it comes up, hes also been injury prone lately.  Bulk of the contract will be on opposite side of 30.  Will both of these guys help us be better in 2026?  SURE!  No doubt, but the question is, will these guys help us past 2026...not sure. The investment isnt worth the risk, nor would the ROI be anywhere close to worth it.  Neither guy is moving us from a 6-8 win team to a 8-10 team, period. My point is we're in this state a 6-8 win team IMO and he projects us as  a 4-6 win team.  EVEN if we think Jaire or Ramsey will make us a 6-8 win team, it in NO WAY is worth the money or capital to move that much just to suck kinda less.  
×
×
  • Create New...