Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes Vs islanders game 3 Friday

Panthers Fan 69

By Panthers Fan 69,
in Carolina Hurricanes

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCandyMan Rising Star

TheCandyMan

Posted
Posted

I know it’s not our game, but Id love to see someone go off on the next Islander that sits on one of player’s while they’re down. Matinook took cheap shots to the head in game 1, and Jordo was used as a picnic blanket in game 2. That crap’s gotta stop. But I guess I could settle for just another win, haha. 

Go Canes!

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
DavidEng Grand Master

DavidEng

Posted
Posted (edited)

I don’t want us to take any double minors, but every time Martin is on the ice give him heavy quasi-legal hits for sitting on Staal.

Give the same treatment to Pageau who broke Turbo’s hand with an intentional whack with his stick..

Open the game with chippy play and show them we won’t be intimidated.

Edited by DavidEng
  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
backINblack28 Proficient

backINblack28

Posted
Posted
13 hours ago, DavidEng said:

I don’t want us to take any double minors, but every time Martin is on the ice give him heavy quasi-legal hits for sitting on Staal.

Give the same treatment to Pageau who broke Turbo’s hand with an intentional whack with his stick..

Open the game with chippy play and show them we won’t be intimidated.

to be fair, I think teams have tried to play gimmicky get in our head games before and I think lately we have done a much better job of just staying out of it/staying out of the box more.  It has doomed us in the past (particularly v Boston) and I think we now look like the more disciplined and experienced team against these lesser playoff seeds.  Keep playing our game--that's what's got them frustrated and undisciplined 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Harbingers Grand Master

Harbingers

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, backINblack28 said:

to be fair, I think teams have tried to play gimmicky get in our head games before and I think lately we have done a much better job of just staying out of it/staying out of the box more.  It has doomed us in the past (particularly v Boston) and I think we now look like the more disciplined and experienced team against these lesser playoff seeds.  Keep playing our game--that's what's got them frustrated and undisciplined 

Agreed I was very impressed how we handled things Wednesday night. We can’t get pulled into the cheap shot game. We have to make the islanders play skill. After the first it seemed the islanders pulled back on the cheap shot game. We’ll see tonight though. If they get chippy, don’t bite. Take the 2’s not the 4’s,5’s or 10’s. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...