Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would you guys rather have a rookie over the guy that literally owned the Panthers


signVick

Recommended Posts

Michael Vick literally owned the Panthers?

If you don't know how to properly use a word, just don't use it. The improper use of "literally" is such a pet peeve of mine.

I opened this thread thinking that someone was proposing that Jerry Richardson could play QB better than any rookie we could

draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, not to be the grammar hammer here, but the title of this thread is ridiculous. I'll cut you a little slack since you've only posted here ten times and because I think you're probably a trolling Falcons fan, but LITERALLY means you are NOT using the word as an emphasization tool. If Vick LITERALLY owned the Panthers - per your thread title - then he would have possession of the majority of the shares of the organization. So, Vick did not literally own the Panthers, he FIGURATIVELY owned the Panthers. But like I said, I'm pretty sure your a Falcons fans, so I'll cut you some slack because I have a pretty clear understanding of the overall education of Falcons fans.

Oh, and the thread title is a question, so you should probably use a question mark at the end of it.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, not to be the grammar hammer here, but the title of this thread is ridiculous. I'll cut you a little slack since you've only posted here ten times and because I think you're probably a trolling Falcons fan, but LITERALLY means you are NOT using the word as an emphasization tool.

It's one thing to use a word improperly -- it's quite another thing to just make a word up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Kalkbrenner and Sion James received regular contracts and not two ways, so the Hornets have some work to do to cut the roster size down. 
    • Gustavsson would be insane. I think we would have to break the bank to afford that move. Which, I don't think is necessarily a bad idea. Ultimately, Freddie isn't likely to be around more than a couple of seasons more. We can all agree that unless they have a fleet of sports psychologists working on Kochetkov, he will never be capable of getting his head on straight enough to compete.
    • I originally hated the Miller deal but with the cap projected to rise nearly $10M next season the Canes struck some pretty good deals between Miller and Ehlers. Most of the team is locked in for the next few years. Nikishin will need an extension probably in the $6M AAV range. And Blake will need one if we don’t move him. Personally I’d move Blake, picks, and any prospect not named Nikishin/Nadeau/Artamonov for McTavish as I don’t see any any of the big time players moving teams next year. Realistically the Hurricanes should just target Gustavsson next year to fix the goal tending issue. But I’m all for moving Blake, picks, and prospects for McTavish this year. Ehlers - Aho - Jarvis Svechnikov - McTavish - Stankoven Martinook - Staal - Carrier Hall - Kotkaniemi - Robinson Jost - Jankowski Slavin - Miller Nikishin - Chatfield Gostisbehere - Walker Reilly Andersen Kochetkov I’d do Blake, Felix-Unger-Sorum, and 27 2nd for McTavish.
×
×
  • Create New...