Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Kobe Jones released - Joe Person


TheWiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

54 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

You are a disgusting piece of sh!t if you try to justify rape.

I would never in my life defend or justify rape the topic was how he cheated on his wife. I thought, you guys are now talking about rape that he was found NOT guilty of so I could never call him a rapist. Typically if you’re found not guilty that means you didn’t do it imo he didn’t rape her so why would I defend something he didn’t do. You’re just a weirdo who is looking to argue over something a man was found not guilty of doing. What’s your angle the logic makes no dam sense stop disrespecting the Late Great Kobe Bean Bryant when you want to argue use facts only it’ll help your silly nonsensical points you’re attempting to make.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, toldozer said:

Then don't get married.  No one is forcing you to and you don't have to split your poo when you ultimately get divorced. You probably shouldn't rape people as well or is that just to be expected of a professional athlete.  Kobe was a piece of poo just bc he died people want to act like he wasn't

Why would you tell someone how to live their life if two people can start a family and enjoy their life together who are we to tell them how to structure their marriage. This makes no dam sense if my wife lets me occasionally sleep with women in our marriage who are you to judge or tell us what to do and not do. The case was dismissed, I never thought and still don’t think he raped her based off the actual facts of the case but you’re entitled to your opinion just don’t try to pass off opinions as facts. I’m not even here to be arguing with another man ever just needed to clear up that misconception of what accusations vs actual fundings and verdicts are. Back to our roster and The Panthers we’ll have more to converse about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, trucpfan said:

Why would you tell someone how to live their life if two people can start a family and enjoy their life together who are we to tell them how to structure their marriage. This makes no dam sense if my wife lets me occasionally sleep with women in our marriage who are you to judge or tell us what to do and not do. The case was dismissed, I never thought and still don’t think he raped her based off the actual facts of the case but you’re entitled to your opinion just don’t try to pass off opinions as facts. I’m not even here to be arguing with another man ever just needed to clear up that misconception of what accusations vs actual fundings and verdicts are. Back to our roster and The Panthers we’ll have more to converse about.

Key word in your whole blabbering was a typo that I find hilarious. Funding is right. How much money did he pay for those allegations to go away. Also I didn't see the need for a Kobe Jones thread hence the hijacking. Sorry if anyone was actually looking for insightful info on the player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Even limited as he was I still don't think they have replaced his production, and not just the sack stats. The games Clowney missed it was very obvious what his value still was. Risky move but whatever. They only had 32 sacks last year and if that drops then it's going to get ugly. I see the improvement in run stopping but not in pass protect in any way.  
    • I have zero issues with this.  
    • Sorta related.  I just looked up a stat:  Success rates for NFL draft's second rounders.  I was surprised that it is 49%.  The success rate for first rounders is 58%.   Here success does not mean those that did not bust, it means that roughly half of the players selected in the second round become full-time starters at some point in their careers.  Busts do that too.  However, considering the fact that a first round talent is worth up to 1800 points (first overall pick) more than the first pick of the second round and as low as 350 points (last pick in first round) higher than the last pick in round 2, it seems there could be cases in which it would be to your advantage to trade out of round 1 and draft two or three second rounders for the value.  Of course, the elite players are likely to be gone, and some positions overwhelmingly suck after round 1 (traditionally, like QB or LT, for example), but if you need to find starters at positions like DT, G, LB, S, C, TE, RB, etc, there could be a time when you trade back for more starters.  I was surprised that the margin between rounds 1 and 2 was only 9%.    While I realize that some of you sofa scholars are thinking, "Well duh?  Trading back gives you more players." as you wipe the Cheetos off your shirt.  Not the point.  The point is you have to consider the draft,the needs (and the number of them), and you need to scout the second and third rounds like you do the first, the cap, and the long-term impact.  If you can find 2 players with a 49% chance of becoming a starter, are you better off than drafting one player who has a 58% chance in the long term? So if I traded away my first rounder for two second rounders (a trade most teams would make) regularly, when I got 10 second rounders (by trading 5 first rounders), 5 would be starters.  If I did not trade and kept my 5 first rounders, 3 would be starters.  Furthermore, their rookie contracts would be much cheaper than the 5 first rounders. 
×
×
  • Create New...