Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Trade Jonathan Stewart!


Munkey

Recommended Posts

Stew is a starter, but we would be unlikely to get his value in draft picks, and I doubt we'd get back what we used on him.

I do think that if D-Will stays healthy and Sutton continues to develop, we could part with him for the right deal, but I am glad we have him for now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100 yards against a defense that hasnt given up a 100 yard day in 36 games (Nov. 07). I told people on this board STOP f**kING undervaluing Stew because you love D Will so much. The kid is a beast for us and without him our RB core is not nearly as potent.

Yep. Why should some folks hate on a guy who is just as good as DeWill? Looking at how Stewart did when DeWill got hurt early in the first half, we should be thankful Fox & Hurney made the right decision with getting Stewart. While I think Sutton would do ok, but Stewart is the one who can do it all that & more. If we never got Stewart, I don't think Sutton & Goodson could do enough to help us score and win compare to Double Trouble. We love Double Trouble & we hope they will be here for several more years. :sifone:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trading a great player isn't necessarily a bad idea, if you can get good value in return and if you have another great player at his position (D-Will). The thing is, Stewart has been dynamite for us this year when D-Will has gone down to injury. RB's get dinged up all the time, and I think it's going to be to our benefit to keep the two of them here as long as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

100 yards against a defense that hasnt given up a 100 yard day in 36 games (Nov. 07). I told people on this board STOP f*ckING undervaluing Stew because you love D Will so much. The kid is a beast for us and without him our RB core is not nearly as potent.

I agree 110%. I've loved this kid since we drafted him and while he's not as good as DeAngelo he gives us so much flexibility in being able to keep our RB corps fresh during a game. But tonight he showed he can carry the load too, and he really did wear down that defensive line to the point that it just couldn't keep up with our patchwork OL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

leave the strengths alone unless you want to make them stronger. build around it. make everything else around it better. the team needs to find balance but it doesn't need to happen at the expense of the best part of it. find players that will help make the passing game every bit as good/dangerous as the running game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We will lose him in free agency unless we decide to trade DWill and keep him long term.

Bottom line is one of them won't be a Panther soon come 2011. I for one would rather have something for him in return.

If you think they will both stay Panthers indefinitely....wake up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

We will lose him in free agency unless we decide to trade DWill and keep him long term.

Bottom line is one of them won't be a Panther soon come 2011. I for one would rather have something for him in return.

If you think they will both stay Panthers indefinitely....wake up.

Frank and Moose were discussing today how the Patriots are great at trading veterans for draft picks. They solve their weaknesses by drafting lots of players and playing the odds. One of them said trade Steve Smith but that just doesn't make sense given the chemistry between him and Newton.

Now that our defense is so bad and our Offense is great it may be time to consider it again.

Even if we get a 3rd or 4th for Stewart we may need to consider it. Could we even get a 2nd??

HOWEVER given Hurney's inability to find talent in the 3rd and 4th rounds maybe not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I can agree that he's not the same traditional tight end as say Warren but he's not that different from Loveland in a guy that plays more like a slot HVAC type row I don't think they're that much there He's probably not as good a route runner but with all that said none of them are the athlete that he is so it's kind of a watch there can I save for a fact that he's going to elite player probably not  You're asking for a wide receiver 3 and that's kind of what this would be in a way but accept bigger and just as explosive he's faster than all the guys that you would find at this point in the draft to feel a slot need and he's a red zone weapon with size verticality and such I think he's just a bigger mismatch than those guys you name Yes your banking on potential I think he's a bigger threat to make a play after the catch just based off strength size and just dog. I can't say I know what the Panthers look for in terms of arm length at the tight end position because we haven't drafted an elite first round tight end almost ever but if I'm looking at the way they have made their moves this offseason they drafted to where they don't have to reach it need and they've addressed most of those needs and this is one of the secondary needs that fit the draft range and if available there's a good chance that's a deep will be gone by time we pick I think you're blessed if he does fall to 19
    • What you are going to see from MHS831, your "source for Panther Predictions that are Unlikely to Happen but if they did, they would be 'real cool,'" is a position-by-position breakdown of needs that we seem to have normalized.  Tight End:  The team is looking for a "game-breaker" and to improve upon a 24th-ranked red-zone offense. Though they have brought back their own players for depth, the organization is looking for more competition to improve the position's overall impact.  In 2025, the unit averaged 8.1 yards per reception, failing to consistently stretch the field or provide a "scary" threat to opposing defenses.  I think they were hoping that Sanders would be that person.  He is not.  I have read some Huddlers demanding the "all-around" TE, and that point is valid.  However, you have to think about the focus on developing Young and the new age TE in the NFL.    "The Carolina Panthers have heavily utilized multi-tight end sets, ranking among the top NFL teams in using 13 personnel (three tight ends)—a strategy they employed on 7.8% of plays during the 2025 season. Under coach Dave Canales, the team employs these formations to bolster the run game and create diverse passing matchups."  This is why a seam-busting, pass-catching TE is so critically important for the Panthers.   This need is perhaps much bigger than we realize.  Do not discount the possibility of drafting Sadiq if he is there; I have seen him in the top 15 frequently. Too many drops for me, personally, and I am not a fan of a TE in round 1 (gotta think salary cap--grab a position that normally gets a high salary on the second contract--not a TE)  Stowers in round 2 is also an option.  I am intrigued by Trigg, a TE who should be drafted in the third round. Let our interest in Njoku demonstrate the kind of TE we seek right now.  Do we need blocking TEs?  Yes, but in a two or three WR set, maybe not as much as a traditional TE. I get the feeling we are not finished at TE.  (Njoku?  I am predicting that he goes to Chicago or Baltimore or Miami--Chicago #1)  
    • I'm not disagreeing with Bryce not being elite I think he's just middle of the roads kind of guy and maybe that's all he'll ever be but that might be enough to win after what we've seen with Donald I think you have to build around that and add people who can make him look better just like Jackson Smith did with Donald they also had an elite back in the backfield that help and an elite defense.  I think McMillan is nice but you don't have anyone that really strikes fear and defenses deep or anything anything to keep defensive honest I understand you feel like they neglected defense in the draft when most of the time after the first pick they stuck to their defensive guns and then you spend your entire offseason market on the defense The defense isn't really the problem The defense was drastically improved in average and you added a pro bowler and another guy who could be a top 10 rusher like how much more do you want to invest in the defense  You know what was the problem we couldn't score 21 to 28 points consistently and if you're stuck with Bryce you have to find another way to make that number look better IE playmakers somebody to is a threat to score every game that can open things up That's where you get better at not just making a strength stronger like that's not the reason you lost to the Rams
×
×
  • Create New...