Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Doctor Who 60th special trailer.


Harbingers
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

Eh, looks ok. Tennant back as an older Doctor will probably be good though doesn't make sense since the last Doctor was a woman. Tate back as Donna will suck, at least to me. She was an annoying companion. I'll probably pass though. I gave up on the show a few years ago.

Nah man. You gotta get past Donna’s “annoying”, once you get her for her she is amazing. Tate plays the edginess of the character to perfection. 

I agree on the last few years, Chibnall sucked as the head-writer/show runner. Jodie did everything she could but Chibnall really did not deliver a compelling story. Too many gimmicks, too much trying to change the through line. But now we got Russell T Davies back. I still think Mark Gatiss should have been the selection instead of Chibnall and should have been the next one after Chibnall but you know Davies is going to deliver a quality product. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Nah man. You gotta get past Donna’s “annoying”, once you get her for her she is amazing. Tate plays the edginess of the character to perfection. 

I agree on the last few years, Chibnall sucked as the head-writer/show runner. Jodie did everything she could but Chibnall really did not deliver a compelling story. Too many gimmicks, too much trying to change the through line. But now we got Russell T Davies back. I still think Mark Gatiss should have been the selection instead of Chibnall and should have been the next one after Chibnall but you know Davies is going to deliver a quality product. 

No, I don't have to get past it. 😁

Seriously though, all the family/friends/lovers they've been bringing in to expand the cast and show the companions having lives outside the Doctor has been a bit much too. The whole point of the show has always been the Doctor and his companion(s) traveling through time and saving folks. It's never needed all the other BS.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

No, I don't have to get past it. 😁

Seriously though, all the family/friends/lovers they've been bringing in to expand the cast and show the companions having lives outside the Doctor has been a bit much too. The whole point of the show has always been the Doctor and his companion(s) traveling through time and saving folks. It's never needed all the other BS.

I disagree during the RTD and Steven Moffat era’s. All the intricate plot devices that were created by the previous companions, families, etc worked. Outside of the Doctor(s) obviously, I think Donna’s grandfather was probably my favorite character at least in the new iterations. Followed by Amy and Rory. The whole man who waited saga was just brilliant. Then definitely River Song. I know Donna puts a lot of people off. But she is just so well portrayed. Kind of like Mary McDonnell as Laura Roslin on battlestar. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neil Patrick Harris as the Toymaker should be good.

Disney's investment into Dr Who production is a win. If they were smart, they'd figure out a way to make a Dr Who-oriented attraction and meet-n-greet with any number of different Doctors and Tardis photo op.

https://www.doctorwho.tv/news-and-features/bbc-and-disney-branded-television-join-forces-on-doctor-who 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Well boys. Rods playoff bust just showed up again. We traded for Gutz and Kuzy and it didn’t matter. It just flat out sucked. Our goalie became an issue again.  We have some major off-season questions.  1.  Is rod our guy?  Could we find anyone better?   2. Gutz and Jarvis.  Sign them. Would they want to play for a team that flames out every postseason? 3. Goalie. Again. Major issue. Koochie and Martin going forward. Cut Freddie  4. Burns, Staal, Martnook. These boys are getting old. How much do they have left? 5. Necas. I’d try to resign him to a new deal.    6. Skjei and Pesce. You get one but with how shitty the playoffs went you may get two.    7. Morrow and Nikishin.  How fast can they get up to speed?     8. Rod again. His system in the playoffs is trash unless perfection in net happens.    what a sad ending to a great year. Bad coaching decisions killed us. We got Gutz and set the world on fire with the JAG line but rods boy crush in Svech derailed the one.  Imagine the JAG line in the playoffs????  You blew it rod. You blew it again. This was our window. It’s gone. 
    • I’d let him walk.  Players play. Coaches coach.  This team has talent.  Our ceiling is set.  If Rod somehow stays.  Let Koochie play. Freddie is the reason we lost this series. This guy was balls. I mean he sucked. Freddie was Meazik bad.  It’s Koochies team now.  If rods flameout playoff style is the standard then I will not be renewing my season tix. I’ll save money and watch us loss at home. 
    • What's shampoo got to do with this? Ahhhh, maybe a short joke.
×
×
  • Create New...