Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many times are you going to let John Fox fool you?


Sam Mills Fan

Recommended Posts

How about a set of back-to-back winning seasons? John Fox is going to tie the record for most years coached without a set of back-to-back winning seasons in league history. If the Falcons win next week, the Panthers will be the only franchise in the league without back-to-back winning seasons along with the Texans.

Well you can't really blame him for having a losing season in 2002, 2004 or 2007. 02' he inherited a 1-15 team. '04 the whole team was injured, '07 he had Carr and Testaverde.

Two seasons 06 and this year were somewhat disappointing. 06 I think was worse than 09 because the team started 4-2 and tanked completely at the end, getting embarassed a few times in the process. This year was bad because of the obvious unncessary loyalty to Delhomme. Still, to see them play the last two weeks it is clear that he has not lost this team. And there is a ton of talent as long as he can learn from his mistakes and never let Delhomme play again. Fox is an upper echelon coach and deserves next year to get the ship righted. If he can't do it next year, I agree it's time for a change. But I bet we come back strong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this "cycle" you refer to is consistent, next year we should have a winning record. With this said, Fox's contract is up at the end of next season and we will have a Andy Reid situation (we basically already do). So I'm going to agree to disagree about this cycle notion.

I can see Hurney getting fired and us keeping Fox until his contract is up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Took Atlanta over 40 years to have back to backs, we have comparable playoff wins and equal superbowl appearances in a lot less time.

So? A slew of franchises have had back-to-back winning seasons just since Fox was hired here. Let's try to have a better standard than a historically sad franchise like the Falcons please.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Browsing around the board during the game, I'm seeing the same predictable posts about how suddenly Fox isn't that bad, he should return, this is a playoff team, etc.

Haven't we gone through this boring cycle enough times for you all to get it? Here is how every two seasons will always go with John Fox as Head Coach:

- Have a nice regular season and make the playoffs only to not win the Super Bowl.

followed by

- Have an extremely disappointing season only to start playing well when there is no longer anything to play for. Rattle off three or four wins in December to make the season look better than it really was.

What you all need to think about and what Jerry Richardson needs to think about is: Is this endless cycle justifiable to keep Fox around indefinitely?

If having an exciting season every other year (with no Super Bowl title to go with it) followed by a disappointing season where we finish strong in garbage time to go 7-9 or 8-8 is good enough for you, then you should want Fox to stay here.

If it's not good enough for you and your goal is an actual consistent, Super Bowl-winning team, John Fox will NEVER be the guy for the job.

We've seen it time after time after time. When the team is favored in a big game, they never ever get it done. When they're huge underdogs to good teams in meaningless games, there is nobody better at playing spoiler.

Is that good enough for you? Mediocrity? Being consistently inconsistent?

It's not good enough for me and it shouldn't be good enough for you or for Jerry Richardson either.

FIRE FOX

This.

If your happy with Fox as an HC your happy with being mediocre.. Point Blank

It's not Jake's fault he was still starting when he clearly couldn't play anymore, Fox sticking with Jake means he was intent on this team not progressing.

Then weeks later when he is benched and Matt plays better, Fox still says he has confidence in Jake..

Fox needs to fuging go, or shake up his philosophy and staff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fox deserves an extension, it's plain and simple. The Panthers had NOTHING to play for and we just beat two playoff-caliber teams. Matt Moore should be the starter next year and Delhomme should stay as the backup QB.

That is fairy tale thinking. Paying a back-up 13 mil with no future with the team is absurd. Especially with him being the scapegoat of this season and his history with Fox, who looks like he will prolly stay thanks to Moore saving his ass. Jake is as good as gone!

Fox gets too many breaks...his stay is iffy. But Delhomme will definitely be gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This.

If your happy with Fox as an HC your happy with being mediocre.. Point Blank

It's not Jake's fault he was still starting when he clearly couldn't play anymore, Fox sticking with Jake means he was intent on this team not progressing.

Then weeks later when he is benched and Matt plays better, Fox still says he has confidence in Jake..

Fox needs to f*cking go, or shake up his philosophy and staff.

Good post. John Fox is an underachiever, I WANT HIM GONE EVEN MORE NOW. It took us getting knocked out of the playoffs for him to motivate this team to play its best football. But when the bright lights and expectations are on us, he folds up like a lawnchair EVERY TIME. He's always gonna do JUST ENOUGH to save his job. And thats what he's done in these last 3 games. Looks like its working too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If he had pulled Jake 11 weeks ago we would be in the Playoffs. .

You don't know that any ore than you know know that Jake could not possibly have performed better over the last 4 games. I see a lot of changes in the play calling. If Jake had been in there, Stewart would have had his 100 by half time then we would have been throwing all second half and ended up letting them come back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Not sure who said it first, but Tepper is the correct answer. Still, I'm gonna go with Kasay keeping it inbounds. If, you subscribe to the butterfly effect version of time travel consequences.... When we win SBXXXVIII everybody's lives change: Moose never breaks his leg, We win it all again in 05. Tommy Jone is unknown and Peppers stays home, Champs once more 2008. No artificial pig heart turning JR into a creepy weirdo, no lockout, no Clausen. Fox and Jake ride off into the sunset on their own terms. No 2-14, no #1 pick. But, no laptop, no Blinn, 3 years behind The Golden Calf of Bristol, we still get Cam. JR let's him grow his locs like he always wanted, Smitty sees Cam in a new light. Dreads swinging, (and Smitty with his 3 Lombardis behind him) Cam is old enough to get those calls. No Manning narrative, Cotchery TD, PI against Talib on Philly Brown, 10,000 RTP calls and Kony Ealy SB50 MVP. No Jeans Fridays, no Tepper. KB doesn't slip on his own meatsweat mid-route in SD, Cam becomes the 1st QB to win 10 straight SBs. Retiring after being elected 47th president of the US of A, Cam ushers in the Permanent Proletarian Revolution across the globe, Xi Jinping bows in awe. "ẄøŘƙƐṛ§ őF ŧĤə ŵØRłð, ŮŊÏŦƐ!!!"
    • Yeah your right the owner was copping hand shandies while all this was going down 
    • I mean not surprised the Patriots took him in and aren't trying to push him out. They've been the most morally bankrupt team in the NFL for a long while. Wouldn't be surprised if Vrabel has his own dirt on Kraft/Brady and other assholes from that organization over the last couple decades. 
×
×
  • Create New...