Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How much compensation would the Panthers get for Moore?

hepcat

By hepcat,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Mekeritrig Newbie

Mekeritrig

Posted
Posted

Depending on how much Moore would be offered, if the Panthers did not match that offer these are the draft picks they would be awarded.

$2.562 million - First- and third-round

$2.017 million - First-round

$1.417 million - Second-round

$927,000 - Nothing because Moore was undrafted

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

The Panthers will slap the 2nd round tag on him.. if someone offer's him a contract, the Panthers will match. More than likely, they want to see him do well the first 5-6 games of the 2010 season, before they offer him a long term deal. Similar to Tony Romo in Dallas.. he came in the tail end of 06' played really well, and then got a new deal 5 games in to the 07 season, when he showed it was no fluke.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandy Claws Newbie

Sandy Claws

Posted
Posted

The Panthers will slap the 2nd round tag on him.. if someone offer's him a contract, the Panthers will match. More than likely, they want to see him do well the first 5-6 games of the 2010 season, before they offer him a long term deal. Similar to Tony Romo in Dallas.. he came in the tail end of 06' played really well, and then got a new deal 5 games in to the 07 season, when he showed it was no fluke.

They won't do that because it'll allow another team to dictate terms of the deal. Poison pills suck. They'll try to negotiate a long term deal for moderate salaries with escalators if he starts a certain number of games or achieves certain incentives just like what they did with Weinke. If we do offer the RFA tender, it'll be with the intention of letting him go for the draft picks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Carl Spackler Grand Master

Carl Spackler

Posted
Posted

If we do offer the RFA tender, it'll be with the intention of letting him go for the draft picks.

Which will be the single decision that will make me more livid than any other since we traded for Sean Gilbert. It will also set us back and help keep us in the laughingstock standings of NFL QB employment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sandy Claws Newbie

Sandy Claws

Posted
Posted

Which will be the single decision that will make me more livid than any other since we traded for Sean Gilbert. It will also set us back and help keep us in the laughingstock standings of NFL QB employment.

The other side of that "IF" was working the deal to keep him. I don't see it as an option to let him "test the market" because once he signs an offersheet, we're stuck with the terms or we let him go. We would be better to dictate our own terms IF our management folks see him as the QB going forward and Moore wants to stay here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...