Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Carolina super bowl stat.


ThatSeptemberDay

Recommended Posts

Silly stat is silly. I bet any of us could come up with some retarded stat like that. First off, we only play four AFC teams a year, and an AFC team has one something like nine of the past 14 Super Bowls.

OOOH, I got one. No team that has broken Steve Smith's forearm on a TD catch has gone on to win the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly stat is silly. I bet any of us could come up with some retarded stat like that. First off, we only play four AFC teams a year, and an AFC team has one something like nine of the past 14 Super Bowls.

OOOH, I got one. No team that has broken Steve Smith's forearm on a TD catch has gone on to win the Super Bowl.

It's one of the more interesting ones.

Also, didn't someone say this exact same thing a few days ago, before he posted that? HE'S STEALING MATERIAL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this version better: We are the bellweather that decides whether you win the super bowl or not. If you lose to us you don't have the fortitude for sustained battle. But if you beat us you are good enough to win it all. We obviously are a tough test which helps other teams survive and makes them battle tested enough to survive the race to the super bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You don't have to go through every game and point it out as we are discussing his GWDs. You specifically called out that he had GWDs because he is the reason the team is always playing from behind. We looked at those eight games and only Miami stands out as one where he put the team in a hole to begin with. You've added the Atlanta game where the team didn't score a TD but only kicked field goals. You're not trying to change what we're discussing to fit your feelings re: Bryce. That's not necessary. We are discussing GWDs per the thread topic. We have also shown that your opinion that the team has had to always come back due to Bryce was proven to be false as was the claim that "minus one game" was his fault. Appealing to emotion afterwards by trying to broadly paint the rest of the losses in the same way just doesn't work. Where in the Hell did you get that the entire point is the suggestion that BY is more clutch than Jake and/or Cam? It's giving something to be positive about in that Bryce has shown the ability to comeback and win games despite the calamity that might have taken place to put them behind to begin with. How is that blasphemy?
    • His run blocking is making up for his negatives in pass blocking right now.  He’ll still have pass blocking hiccups, but if they think he’s a critical part to the locker room and team construction, you probably re-sign him and try not to overpay.
    • Callahan is gone McDaniel and Taylor are happening Stefanski is a growing possibility. I mean, they need to get an offense going eventually.  Could see Morris as a surprise one.
×
×
  • Create New...