Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Interesting Carolina super bowl stat.


ThatSeptemberDay

Recommended Posts

Silly stat is silly. I bet any of us could come up with some retarded stat like that. First off, we only play four AFC teams a year, and an AFC team has one something like nine of the past 14 Super Bowls.

OOOH, I got one. No team that has broken Steve Smith's forearm on a TD catch has gone on to win the Super Bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silly stat is silly. I bet any of us could come up with some retarded stat like that. First off, we only play four AFC teams a year, and an AFC team has one something like nine of the past 14 Super Bowls.

OOOH, I got one. No team that has broken Steve Smith's forearm on a TD catch has gone on to win the Super Bowl.

It's one of the more interesting ones.

Also, didn't someone say this exact same thing a few days ago, before he posted that? HE'S STEALING MATERIAL!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like this version better: We are the bellweather that decides whether you win the super bowl or not. If you lose to us you don't have the fortitude for sustained battle. But if you beat us you are good enough to win it all. We obviously are a tough test which helps other teams survive and makes them battle tested enough to survive the race to the super bowl.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • We need a Sam Off Ball Backer to pair with Lloyd. Lloyd is a strong Interior Will especially in Pass Coverage- but that is also Trevin Wallace’s archetype. Need a Rozeboom style run stopper. Rodriguez and Allen fit that
    • There aren’t that many ways to screw Day 2 up.  That’d be them making an obvious reach, or selecting at one of the few positions that we are pretty solid at. Because as excited as we are for the growth and improvement this team is showing, it’s still not an overly talented or deep roster. Honestly, there aren’t really many positions I’d feel bad about. Feelings about Bryce aside (because we are not going to select a QB), it’s really RB (bad positional value) and that’s it. I guess OT too since we grabbed Freeling in Round 1.    While not as high on my wish list as other spots, you can justify WR or TE.     Interior offensive lineman who would likely take over an interior spot either this year (at center) or guard (next for cap casualty of Hunt or Lewis)? Fine by me.   Dlineman? Yes, that’s a highly rotational position and we have zero quality depth.    ILB? Yep, could stand for an upgrade over Wallace.    EDGE? Absolutely wouldn’t hate another option to spell Phillips, Scourton, and Princely.    FS?  Would love to add better coverage skill set to the backend of the defense. Moehrig and Ransom are great in run support but not as good deep. Adding a more traditional FS would allow us to mix and match/run some 3 safety sub packages and or a big nickel type look with a SS down near the line for better run support in possible pass downs.    CB? Could stand to get better at nickel. 
    • Sounds like Veesaar is entering the draft. He could always test the waters and pull out and return but without him our big men look like a serious liability. Better do something in the portal. If they don't do something about this portal madness my days as a college sports fan are probably numbered. This bullshit of having a nearly entirely new team every season is gonna get old fast.
×
×
  • Create New...