Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fox leaves, does Jake follow?


Zod

Recommended Posts

The ultimate irony Fox goes to another team and signs Moore off his RFA tender. Any Given Sunday anyone?

But what would be awesome as well as funny as hell, if Foxs goes to another team and trades for Jake. He is probably the only coach in the league that would do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to trade for Jake and his guaranteed salaries for the next 3 years. And he likely isn't going anywhere. So folks can wonder and worry about whether Jake is going to play next year and continue to angst for the next 6 months. Should be good for 20-30 fear threads between now and training camp.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The advantage is a roster spot that is not wasted on a player with no prospects.

You really think that we can't offer one of 80 + roster spots to him going into the season given we will be including UFAs from no name schools, training camp fodder and nobodies. If you had said one of 53 roster spots at the end of the the preseason that is another issue and won't be resolved until August.

That logic makes no sense given what we have invested in him. What are you afraid of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Correct this logic I might if it meant taking his guaranteed money now and spread it over 3 years (2026-2028) and maybe add $6m.  I am not sure you can do that, or that he would do it, but it would be a way for him to extend his career and bank accounts and we would be getting him for $6m for 2 years (if healthy), basically, since his entire salary is guaranteed now.  If not, we lose an additional $6m spread over 2 years.  So let's say his guaranteed $$ for 2026 is $18m.  Give him a $24m contract ($8m per) through 2028.  Worst case:  We get $10m in cap relief now and create $3m dead cap for 2 years (2027-8).   Best case?  We get cap relief now and a good/decent guard/tackle for 2 years (2027-2028) and the total salary per year when he is active would be $12m if you don't count any money for the season he cannot play.  That is a good value, and we'd basically be getting a 50% discount rate.  Since we have so much guaranteed now, extending him is not as crazy as it seems.   Something has to be wrong with this logic...      
    • I don't disagree about Nikishin's potential availability, but Hamilton as a replacement? Not an upgrade in my book.
×
×
  • Create New...