Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2010 Mock Drafts


KBRed

Recommended Posts

Obviously, mock drafts don't mean squat, but I like to see what people think. Here's what is up now. Any thoughts on what actually might be close, or very far off?

Round 2: Jared Odrick, DT, Penn State

Round 3: Jeremy Williams, WR, Tulane

link: http://walterfootball.com/draft2010_2.php

Round 2: Terrence Cody, DT, Alabama

Round 3: N/A

http://walterfootball.com/draft2010matt_2.php

Round 2: Brandon LaFell, WR, LSU

Round 3: Mike Neal, DT, Purdue

http://www.draftsite.com/nfl/2010mock.htm

Round 2: Jevan Snead, QB, Ole Miss

Round 3: Jamar Chaney, LB, Mississippi State

http://newnfldraft.com/archives/1138

Round 2: Tony Pike, QB, Cincinnati

Round 3: N/A

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/311636-2010-nfl-mock-draft-rounds-1-and-2-clausen-slips-out-of-top-10

Round 2: Jevan Snead, QB, Ole Miss

Round 3: N/A

http://www.mynfldraft.com/NFL-Mock-Draft-2010-round-2/

Round 2: Brian Price, DT, UCLA

Round 3: Tony Pike, QB, Cincinnati

http://www.drafttek.com/round22010_33-48.asp

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like the 1st & last mock drafts. I've watched Cincinatti this season & their QB's pretty good, but we also need a WR. Smith's now 30+ & Muhammed may be gone by the end of this season. We need another DT no matter what

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Draftologists have had us picking a QB for years, and we never do. Don't see it happening, especially after LaFors. They seem to forget who they're talking about. We have Jake, we won't need a new QB until 2015.

Moore isn't in your post? :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...