Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What are we missing


WOOD

Recommended Posts

Were good at the 5.

A banger 4, or an excellent spot up shotter with Defense like a Tyrus Thomas.

I wouldn't say we are "good" at the 5. Definitely the 4 spot is getting the least production, but I don't know how much longer Nazr can be expected to contribute like he has and Diop and Chandler both lack any type of NBA offensive skill set.

Regardless, looking at the contracts at the 5 spot, the 3 guys that we have now are going to be the only 3 guys we have for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't say we are "good" at the 5. Definitely the 4 spot is getting the least production, but I don't know how much longer Nazr can be expected to contribute like he has and Diop and Chandler both lack any type of NBA offensive skill set.

Regardless, looking at the contracts at the 5 spot, the 3 guys that we have now are going to be the only 3 guys we have for a while.

god good you talk as if you are in the business...igore.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have two glaring holes right now and neither are at 4, in my opinion.

We need a legit, dyed in the wool, 43% or better shooting guard who can score and create his own offense. Brandon Roy, Joe Johnson, or even a Ben Gordon type scorer.

The next and hardest to fill need we have is that premier 5. He doesn't even have to be spectacular, but even finding above average guys are horrible. This 5 by committee we have just makes us too one dimensional. Brook Lopez would have been a fabulous fit here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Brook Lopez

please don't mention his name..... the pain... the pain..............

but i sort of agree- Captain Jack is playing out of position at the 2- he really is a 3 but Crash aint going anywhere..

so 1 Felton, 2 Jack and 3 Wallace are basically locked in for This season.. 4 and 5 are the positions we could do sumthing about before the deadline..

i personnally would like Samuel Dalembert from the 6ers.. package Diop/Chandler and Flip/Graham for Dalembert and we might be extremely solid..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

please don't mention his name..... the pain... the pain..............

but i sort of agree- Captain Jack is playing out of position at the 2- he really is a 3 but Crash aint going anywhere..

so 1 Felton, 2 Jack and 3 Wallace are basically locked in for This season.. 4 and 5 are the positions we could do sumthing about before the deadline..

i personnally would like Samuel Dalembert from the 6ers.. package Diop/Chandler and Flip/Graham for Dalembert and we might be extremely solid..

So you want to trade a center with no offensive skill set and a shitty contract plus a guard for another center with no offensive skill set and a shitty contract.

BRILLIANT!

Why aren't you an NBA GM?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jamison is on the trading block. Wouldn't mind picking him up for the 4 spot. Athletic power forward has been what we have always needed.

Jamison is still a very good offensive player and a more than adequate rebounder. He isn't the best defender but LB could probably improve that quite a bit.

The Bobs put themselves in the sticky situation where all player acquisitions involving a Tarheel will be held to the highest level of scrutiny. I think Jamison would pass that level of scrutiny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The right answer is neither and drafting Maye with the #1 Pick of the 2024 Draft lmfao we traded away the #1 in a QB LOADED DRAFT
    • I have no idea why you are so irrationally upset about the notion that going out and spending $150 million free agency dollars on two interior offensive linemen could be construed as a panic response after our #1 pick we traded a fortune for had one of the worst rookie seasons of the last 25 years. It is objectively what transpired. Dan Morgan as of right now is a mixed bag. Some really good some so so some not so good some bad some really bad. You take any rational criticism personally like you are related to him or something. That's something you'll have to figure out for yourself. Anyways. The predicament Dan Morgan finds himself in for this year will define his future as GM. I sincerely hope he navigates it to perfection. But the circumstances are largely of his own creation. And not just in his stint as GM but going back to his time as assistant GM. Which conveniently people like yourself don't like to talk about. That is the reality of the situation. I like how you will carry water for Dan Morgan to the point of getting into random spats with people but make no mention of Bryce Young's glaring limitations and shortcomings as a starting QB yet go out of your way to put the onus of our struggles squarely on Canales. I mean I've been quite critical of Canales too but he sure isn't the only one to blame for our problems.
    • They weren't well thought out. We needed one, not both. 2 top center/guard candidates were going to be available in the 2nd. We would have been fine with JPJ or Frazier. Drafting either over XL or Brooks would have made perfect sense. Hell, drafting both would have made sense even if we had signed Lewis or Hunt. Instead we drafted a 1 year wonder project WR and a luxury RB that we didn't need since we had Hubbard. Draft IOL, pay tackles. Plenty of 2nd round guards and centers start immediately and play very well. Those 2 picks were not good then, now, no matter how much explaining anyone tries to do. Several of called it then. 
×
×
  • Create New...