Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What will Matt Moore...


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

the roster update had him go from 64 to 76..he started the year in the 50 rating area..jonathan stewart only went up 1 point to 86>.>

As for Madden 011 i don't know what can happen in the offseason that would improve his grade unless their researchers actually watch him play instead of reading stat sheets..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the roster update had him go from 64 to 76..he started the year in the 50 rating area..jonathan stewart only went up 1 point to 86>.>

As for Madden 011 i don't know what can happen in the offseason that would improve his grade unless their researchers actually watch him play instead of reading stat sheets..

when did the new madden update come out? I tried to update the roster not even 5 minutes ago and it said that there wasn't one yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://maddennfl.easports.com/news.action?newsId=Roster

i don't think it's out technically but the changes are up..not sure if all the changes are there though they don't really care about the Panthers that much lol

wow. so DWill gets his rating decreased(and I'm assuming this is final until madden 2011) because he was injured the last few weeks?

so fuging stupid. would also like to know why Kyle Orton is rated 80 and Matt Moore isn't :| ugh I hate EA. makes me rage because like it or not, QB accuracy actually matters online, can't tell you how many times I've missed WIDE open receivers because of an overthrown/just plain inaccurate ball.

sigh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wow. so DWill gets his rating decreased(and I'm assuming this is final until madden 2011) because he was injured the last few weeks?

so f**king stupid. would also like to know why Kyle Orton is rated 80 and Matt Moore isn't :| ugh I hate EA. makes me rage because like it or not, QB accuracy actually matters online, can't tell you how many times I've missed WIDE open receivers because of an overthrown/just plain inaccurate ball.

sigh.

indeed it is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys, the ratings can only move so much every week and it depends on the position. Matt Moore seems to be an exception or they were waiting to see if he could sustain his play.

Favre started low 80s and jumped to mid 90s. Steve Smith(NYG) started in the damn 70's and iirc is now high 80's. not to mention they dropped the REAL steve smith a few points early on because he wasn't producing(thanks jake) as well as Peppers.

It's just frustrating, I can't pass consistently in Madden because the highest QB on roster is like 71 lol. :|

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...