Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Colin Cowherd Ranks The Panthers 22nd in Least Attractive Team to Coach


Jbro

Recommended Posts

Reason he gave: There is no engine in football, College Bball state, Nascar State, Aging Star Players and QB Issues.

On a side note he ranked the Saints 25th worst. Reason is without Drew Bress/Payton they are nothing. City sucks and they have been horrible for a reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Colin on a lot of things but we have been one of the most successful teams year in and year out for a reason...Jerry Richardson. The guy is one of the best owners in all of sports and keeps things at an even keel around here. There are tons of coaches that would want to work for him.

Colin takes into account regional factors and thats about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Colin and he is usually right on target with most things (unless you are an absolute homer for your team) but I think he missed the mark on that one. Carolina would be an great place to coach if you ask me.

1. - Great Ownership

2. - Absolutely no media pressure

3. - Very forgiving fanbase

4. - Good weather

5. - Great place to raise family (for younger coaches)

6. - Good defense/run game in place

etc...

Other than Steve Smith, who are the aging star players?

This being a college basketball / NASCAR state is not a bad thing.It takes a lot of the pressure to win off the coach if you ask me. The fans still show up on Sundays (unlike places like Jacksonville).

High profile it is not but I could easily think of 15-20 worse places to coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like Colin and he is usually right on target with most things (unless you are an absolute homer for your team) but I think he missed the mark on that one. Carolina would be an great place to coach if you ask me.

1. - Great Ownership

2. - Absolutely no media pressure

3. - Very forgiving fanbase

4. - Good weather

5. - Great place to raise family (for younger coaches)

6. - Good defense/run game in place

etc...

Other than Steve Smith, who are the aging star players?

This being a college basketball / NASCAR state is not a bad thing.It takes a lot of the pressure to win off the coach if you ask me. The fans still show up on Sundays (unlike places like Jacksonville).

High profile it is not but I could easily think of 15-20 worse places to coach.

rep

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...