Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PS3 breaks even


Jangler

Recommended Posts

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123060418044641601.html?mod=googlenews_wsj

Sony Corp. is closer to breaking even on its new-generation PlayStation 3 videogame console because it costs 35% less to make than the previous model, according to technology-research firm iSuppli Corp.

The electronics giant is locked in a battle with Nintendo Co.'s Wii and Microsoft Corp.'s Xbox 360 for control of the videogame-console market. The cost cuts could help stanch the hardware red ink at Sony, which sold the previous-generation PS3 at a significant loss, making up for it with game-title sales and royalties.

Integration and key changes in components has brought the latest PS3's cost down to $448.73 from $690.23 for the first-generation model, said iSuppli.

The PS3 sells for about $399 in the U.S., at least $150 more than Wii and Xbox 360. However, the PS3 accounted for 16% of global videogame-unit shipments in the second quarter of 2008, second only to Nintendo's Wii, which accounted for 54% of the market.

Andrew Rassweiler of iSuppli predicted the PS3 may be able to break even in 2009 with further hardware revisions.

Part of the decline in cost is the result of "the normal learning curve and supply/demand factors that bring component prices down over time," iSuppli said.

Also, integration of components into the core silicon of the PS3 cut the number of individual parts to an estimated 2,820 from 4,048 in the previous-generation model with a 60-gigabyte hard drive.

The cost estimate of $448.73 doesn't include software, box contents and royalty expenses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MS and Sony have been selling at a loss for ages, the xbox 1 didn't make a profit until it's later days, the reason for this is because with the new tech and better graphics they make 10x the loss back in royalties from they're games, I used to know the breakdown per new game, but the publishers pay a fee to Sony, MS and Nintendo so they can make they're games for the console and that's where MS, sony and Nintendo make all of they're money.

the fact that this is a big story for sony just shows how big of a failure the PS3 is, sony tried to do too much and ended up shooting themselves in the foot.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i agree. PS3 had so much potential but it was doomed by dumb asses that only care about making money. they were more concerned with watching out for the shareholders that they forgot to cater to teh consumer (AKA lower prices)

what I would do is the following:

1) lower the price to $275 and take that loss. people will buy the systems if it's cheep enough. Also come down on the prices of accessories.

2) Bring back the 60 GB model. this was, by far, their best model. bring back the original, with backwards compatibility and all of its features. Let that and the 80 GB model be all that you sell. the 60 GB could be 275 and the 80 GB be 325

3) give incentives to developers. more console sales = more development for games. that simple. price drop = increased production in games. it won't hurt to simplify the process for them to use the games

4) fix the current bugs. make online play better and more streamlined. fix up Playstation Home.

5) Resurrect the PSP. The PSP is going down in flames as well (another reason why i'm dumping mines). save the PSP by bringing in developers who can create good games for it. integrate it within the PS3 and make it more interactive

IF sony does all of these things, by the end of 2009, they will be neck and neck with the wii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one is going to compete with Wii for awhile.

360 owns the diehard gamers, Wii owns them and everyone else.

Sony just never got their sh*t together.

I would say the xbox 360 owns the casual gamer(for now), the Wii owns those that are kids or those that are new to gaming (and have so for a long time too), and the PS3 has it's fans and a few casual gamers(used to rule the casual gamer).

The Wii may be killing in console sales but they are dragging way behind the 360 in game sales and you only have to look as far as your local game shop and see what the carry the most games for and see who's winning, right now it's the 360, my local shop has about 1/3 of it's shop for the 360 and the rest for everything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't think Sony will last much longer with all of their pricing policies and trying to go by name recognition alone. this isn't 2001, when they were able to get away with it with the PS2. there's simply too much competition and they're too stubborn to change with the times. their faults really. maybe they can learn something from this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what makes the X-Box360 inferior to the PS3 is the hyped up X-Box live. I rarely hear anything about PS3's online play. Plus, X-box Live is throwing things like Netflix in as a bonus.

Did you mean PS3 is inferior to xbox? Your message is odd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another issue with Playstation is their lack of console-specific games. Little Big Planet is a step in the right direction. When Microsoft first broke into the console market, a large reason for its popularity was Halo. If you wanted to play it, you had to own an xbox. Playstation can really claim too many huge games that are proprietary to their system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another issue with Playstation is their lack of console-specific games. Little Big Planet is a step in the right direction. When Microsoft first broke into the console market, a large reason for its popularity was Halo. If you wanted to play it, you had to own an xbox. Playstation can really claim too many huge games that are proprietary to their system.

Yea right now all i can think of that PS3 has that xbox doesn't, and is a big seller is Metal Gear Solid 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What really did them in was not paying for the exclusive rights to release GTA as a PS game only. They don't have games that draw the online crowd like Halo/GOW. The only thing keeping them afloat imo is Metal Gear Solid (whos head producer I read is working w/ Microsoft for the next halo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm not sure 19 is too high for Rodriguez anymore.  He looks to be moving up boards, but it could be smokescreens.  
    • I see XL this way---great athlete.  Good person.  When we drafted him, we knew he was raw.  One year of WR in college (starting) and in HS, he was a QB, I believe. We knew we would need patience with him.  I think year 3 will be make or break.  He is older, and I think that people with his athletic ability have always been better than those with less---but those with less can become more successful.  Why is that?  in my view, it is mental. XL can learn the mechanics and nuances of playing WR if he becomes focused on it and works at it.  I had the opportunity to talk to Armanti Edwards one day after OTAs (great guy) and he discussed how overwhelming it was.  He seemed shocked.  At that time, I knew that Fox hated the pick (I heard him mock Armanti to another coach when he saw Edwards drop a punt from a jugs machine--then I saw Armanti look back at Fox as if to suggest that he was feeling the pressure to please the coach. We forget that these are kids in their early 20s.  At the time, Fox was a lame duck.  Remember when he had Clausen as the #3 QB and was forced to move him up the ladder?  I liked Fox, but I think the climate and culture was influenced by the politics.  Currently, I see another Wr from SC who is struggling, but he is ina  very nurturing, positive culture. Let's see what happens with XL.  I am frustrated too---but XL was a second round talent who was raw and we traded up to get him.  He had 500 yards as a rookie--lets call 2025 a sophomore slump and see if we can't get at least 50 yards per game out of him.  If not, cut bait.
    • Sadiq feels like a lazy comp.  Sure he would be a big improvement over what we have but at a position we don't and maybe can't (midget qb) utilize.  I hope the staff puts together a list of players you automatically take at 19 (Freeling, Lemon, Downs, Faulk) and if none are there, trade back to look at (Thieneman, McNeil-Warren, Proctor, Lomu, Allen, Iheanachor, Banks, Woods).  I get the people that think an OT would be a waste because we temporarily patched that hole, and ILB and safety are a waste because that is high to take those particular positions, but by trading back we get extra picks to fill every need.  A draft that has an OT, S, ILB, slot WR, and C would really put us in a good position moving forward if we get an extra first three rounds additional pick.   
×
×
  • Create New...