Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Turnstile


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

What site is that? Is that just 1st down? 

https://www.nfeloapp.com/nfl-power-ratings/nfl-team-tendencies/
yes that one was just 1st down.

im trying to find the other ones that listed the full snaps

 

teams are moving heavier and heavier to shotgun

https://www.the33rdteam.com/category/analysis/nfl-teams-moving-out-from-under-cenet-riding-shotgunnfl-teams-riding-shotgun/

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

There is absolutely no way you can tell me young is under center 40% of his snaps unless I am totally reading that wrong

 Can absolutely tell you that because all the statistics and the film tell you that.

and that was was just for 1st down.

now I’m not sure if they don’t account for the pistol as being in shotgun.  
reality regardless.  He isn’t lining up any differently than a lot of teams do in 2023

Im sorry it doesn’t fit what You Want it to say.  But facts are facts Jack.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

This also happens too much for run plays as well.

By far for me the biggest let down is I thought the OL could play in the 10-18 rankings. Only the injured filled giants OL is worse. Panthers are dogshit at OL. 

2nd overall in false starts as well, just terrible. 

They’re awful all around 

Pass blocking is absolutely dog poo 2.4 second avg was right at a entire full second avg less than what the Texans gave up this weekend.

and run game has been the most suprising because that was the whole entire perceived strength coming into the year.  But they’re getting whipped.

Then all the Penalties.  It’s like Byron Bell all over again.

 

It has to be the scheme.  Has to be.  Because this big a drop off a cliff is crazy.

Then this goes back to Fitty.  Knowing you are going to a knew scheme and you have guys who fit the other scheme that may not be perfect fits.  Why didn’t you do a better job in FA and draft in finding depth guys who fit this system that could push these guys or take a spot due to fit.   it’s like there was zero communication with the staff and the front office of what the he11 was going on.
dropped the ball really badly this offseason with FA and mid rd picks 

Edited by ncfan
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, ncfan said:

 Can absolutely tell you that because all the statistics and the film tell you that.

and that was was just for 1st down.

now I’m not sure if they don’t account for the pistol as being in shotgun.  
reality regardless.  He isn’t lining up any differently than a lot of teams do in 2023

Im sorry it doesn’t fit what You Want it to say.  But facts are facts Jack.

There is absolutely no way he is under center 40% of his plays.  That’s just not factual.    

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CRA said:

There is an old thread where I found the % of each year for him.  I low season for Frank was generally around the 65ish range I think.   I think he was top 5ish in Indy and lead the NFL the year he was fired in SD. 

Bryce was no doubt going to drive it to Frank’s high end.  

I’d  be curious of Bama’s numbers. Don’t watch a lot of them.  I mean Clemson won’t even get under C on the 1.  

Bryce took like 7 snaps under center his entire time at bama or something like that. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Sorry to burst your bubble but it is.

just because it doesn’t fit your narrative doesn’t mean it isn’t true 

Show me the plays where Bryce is lined up under center this season for the panthers. IF we are not in shotgun we are in pistol, not a whole hell of a lot of difference. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I just literally rewatched the first half and young was never under center.  Whatever stats ncfan is using is a complete lie.   Young is rarely under center.    

Now this was just shotgun% 

and I am assuming they are not accounting pistol as a shotgun much of that 40% is probably in pistol.

 

Now it still doesn’t change the fact that much of the league is moving away from being under center.

Philly was under center only 12% of the snaps vs 88% out of the gun last year.  
I need to find the site but after game 4 I tried to look into this.  And  there was one that listed us at 86% outside of center to 14% under center.  Which is about accurate and still under what the Eagles ran last year.

Also this jives with what we heard coming into the season.  There was an interview or PC where Miles Sanders said this offensive system is going to look a lot like what they ran in Philly.  The eagles outside the “tush push” formation, rarely lineup under center.  
Now Personnel wise.  Eagles OL compared to ours is like comparing our WRs with Theilen to Miami and Tyreek Hill.  Eagles have 1 of the top 3 OLs in the NFL while ours is bottom 2.  And if you aren’t winning in the trenches you aren’t winning ball games no matter the QB

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Now this was just shotgun% 

and I am assuming they are not accounting pistol as a shotgun much of that 40% is probably in pistol.

 

Now it still doesn’t change the fact that much of the league is moving away from being under center.

Philly was under center only 12% of the snaps vs 88% out of the gun last year.  
I need to find the site but after game 4 I tried to look into this.  And  there was one that listed us at 86% outside of center to 14% under center.  Which is about accurate and still under what the Eagles ran last year.

Also this jives with what we heard coming into the season.  There was an interview or PC where Miles Sanders said this offensive system is going to look a lot like what they ran in Philly.  The eagles outside the “tush push” formation, rarely lineup under center.  
Now Personnel wise.  Eagles OL compared to ours is like comparing our WRs with Theilen to Miami and Tyreek Hill.  Eagles have 1 of the top 3 OLs in the NFL while ours is bottom 2.  And if you aren’t winning in the trenches you aren’t winning ball games no matter the QB

Stop comparing us to philly. They have the best OL in the league, a QB that can make you pay with his legs, and quality WRs. We dont have any of that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PootieNunu said:

Stop comparing us to philly. They have the best OL in the league, a QB that can make you pay with his legs, and quality WRs. We dont have any of that. 

I’m only comparing them systematically not personnel.

Those were Miles Sanders words to.

Also the numbers when you look at formations etc.  I already mentioned in that post you quoted they have a top 3 OL and we have a bottom 2 as it stands today.

Edited by ncfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
    • Sanders is with Tom Brady brand and that's his mentor. The Raiders owner was with Sanders taking pics at a Vegas game together.   It doesn't take much to connect the dots that Vegas will be interested in Sanders as their franchise QB. Oh yeah and guess who hasa small ownership stake in the Raiders Tom Brady.   I guess this is just another made up Madden idea by me huh?
×
×
  • Create New...