Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Offseason FA!!


recceice
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Evil Hurney said:

The Bengals have more (effective) cap space. They have already paid Burrow, so that is accounted for.

image.png.7959e9e5aa353e008514cc62506067ab.png

If they want Higgins at his price tag they can afford him. The only way he hits FA is if they decide he isn't worth "that" contract.

It's a similar situation we are in with Burns; we can afford him, but is he worth "that" contract?

Again they are in win now mode and probably will dedicate more money to their defense who just lost both safeties and most of the secondary.. Plus the Dline and Oline will need more attention.. They will probably see Higgins has out priced the market.. Sign Boyd to a cheaper deal.. Then Draft a rookie Wr because they have a established vet QB so they can spend less on weapons..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, recceice said:

Nooooooooooi!!! 
Stop with this dumb fug thinking!!

How many years of watching Cam having to carry rookie WRs work?? 
 

Why are some of you 1st to complain about this team  but so willing to do the same poo over and over and over again??

Keep running down ur dipper agenda...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

It's a positive for Burrow. You're really missing the point here.

No you’re missing the point.. Burrows is better then any QB DJ has ever had.. 

Still doesn’t change the fact that DJ had more opportunities.. 

If the target share was similar then you have a point.. But the fact that DJ had way more opportunities to produce no matter who threw was playing QB and Higgins did the same numbers with less opportunities isn’t a glaring issue against Higgins.. It proves the point that he could be just as good as DJ no matter who is throwing him the ball..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Keep running down ur dipper agenda...

I’m sorry my agenda is for this team to be good so I can watch a good team play.. 

Not go to a message board and be the biggest bitch/troll because I enjoy other ppl misery..

My bad for not wanting to be a loser..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

BUT WE ARE...lmao.

No you are.. You choose to sit here and bitch poo that won’t change.. While other want to to discuss ways out of this hell hole..

Dam at some point I’m going to stop dreaming about another man’s wife and improve the one I have…

Edited by recceice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, recceice said:

No you are.. You choose to sit here and bitch poo that won’t change.. While other want to to discuss ways out of this hell whole..

Its easy...it all hinges on one dude to step up...discuss and cuss all you want...in the grand scheme of things your voice is as loud as a piss ant...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

If we're bringing in better, we need to bring in much better. Davis ain't that. He's no better than Chark.

This I agree… You have to bring in proven talent to make a decision at QB.. And you got to do it while he is making rookie money..

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Johnstonny said:

Its easy...it all hinges on one dude to step up...discuss and cuss all you want...in the grand scheme of things your voice is as loud as a piss ant...

Here we go..

So you can understand..

The answer isn’t in this locker room.. And we aren’t getting CJ Stroud nor are we cutting BY.. So the only option is giving BY the best chance for success and it isn’t going to happen by sitting here and waiting on somebody to step up or Dreaming about drafting CJ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • To all the analysts who said "Caps in 5", thank you for telling us their departure time.
    • We won't know the answer to this for a long time. Reality is, Caleb has been the consensus #1 in that draft for years. Bryce was a similar situation, but mostly the same. He was not the clear and obvious #1 that Caleb was, but most teams had Bryce at QB1. The Panthers were always going to be terrible Bryce's rookie year.  I don't think DJ Moore's presence would have changed anything about that offense, as our guards, center, and left tackle were getting demolished on nearly every snap. It's clear Caleb's dad was trying to do everything possible to ensure Caleb didn't end up in Chicago with Eberflus. It's hard to imagine that he wouldn't have done the same, but probably more publicly with our situation, considering Carolina is an easier target for the media than Chicago. We can all speculate, but it's impossible to tell who is going to have the better career on May 16, 2025. If either QB doesn't pan out, we have an easy answer. If both flame out, the bears clearly won the trade, but it wouldn't have really mattered anyway. We all know how we win the trade. Candidly, even if one of the other picks we gave up ends up being a hall of fame player, we don't know if the panthers would have taken that player anyway. All you can do is make the best decision you can in the moment with the information you have. I really like Bryce Young, and I'm glad he's a Carolina Panther.  The only way to win in the modern NFL is to have an absolute dude at QB. I personally am happy that our franchise recognizes this, as I remember times when they did not. 
×
×
  • Create New...