Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Halo: Reach


Doc Holiday

Recommended Posts

the single player in combat evolved was revolutionary IMO. It wasn't original in any of it's gameplay innovations but it was the first game to put all those innovations into one package and pull it off. That game was around before XBOX live so the multiplayer didn't carry it like future games. It wouldn't have sold so well if the single player wasn't great.

I know. I got my original Xbox in Nov 2001. I didn't give Halo a lot of thought because FPS games were horrible on consoles (with the exception of Goldeneye on N64).

But I finally tried it out - it controlled well, you could drive (!), there were open areas (not Doom-type mazes), intelligent friendlies and enemies, a pretty good story - the whole game blew my mind.

I loved playing with the physics in the game - there were no invisible walls like in Halo 2 or 3. You could take banshees and fly to areas you were never meant to see. You could skip entire sections of a level to get a banshee and fly to areas where the AI would be "turned off" (all the characters would just stand and not react to anything).

Compare that to the other 2 games, where you are forced to stay on a straight path and the enemies spawn when you reach a certain point. That's stuff of standard games, not epic games like Combat Evolved.

I used to play "bumper cars" in multiplayer on Halo CE. The only shooting allowed was from the turret, and that was only allowed after the warthogs collided and the driver/gunner from one warthog fell out. Otherwise, the goal was to run them over.

You can't do that on 2 or 3 - the warthogs are no longer indestructibe. :mad:

Halo 3 was a little better as far as the single player. But it was the first Halo game I couldn't beat alone on Legendary. I don't see how anyone can get through the sniper levels playing solo. Yes, 4 player coop is doable. Alone is not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ODST was an expansion pack that didn't require the full game, had nothing to do with it, and was fully priced at 60 dollars.

Okay.

And don't compare games because people call you a fine young male when you go on xbox live, or glitch a lot. I'm discussing the games' content, not the idiots who play them online.

To be honest, every game has felt like an expansion of the original Halo, since nothing major has been done to it since it's original release. The narrative is beyond stale. Even though there are some cool ideas on the grand scheme of things as far as the world and the story are concerned, they are never realized.

I have never once cared about a single character in any Halo game. It's incredibly dull, and the gameplay has done nothing to push the envelope since the original came out... which basically did what PC shooters had been doing for years. So it leaves people like me unimpressed. Then taking into account that each release has been weaker and weaker, I'm not exactly about to jump out of my seat for Halo: Reach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know. I got my original Xbox in Nov 2001. I didn't give Halo a lot of thought because FPS games were horrible on consoles (with the exception of Goldeneye on N64).

But I finally tried it out - it controlled well, you could drive (!), there were open areas (not Doom-type mazes), intelligent friendlies and enemies, a pretty good story - the whole game blew my mind.

I loved playing with the physics in the game - there were no invisible walls like in Halo 2 or 3. You could take banshees and fly to areas you were never meant to see. You could skip entire sections of a level to get a banshee and fly to areas where the AI would be "turned off" (all the characters would just stand and not react to anything).

Compare that to the other 2 games, where you are forced to stay on a straight path and the enemies spawn when you reach a certain point. That's stuff of standard games, not epic games like Combat Evolved.

I used to play "bumper cars" in multiplayer on Halo CE. The only shooting allowed was from the turret, and that was only allowed after the warthogs collided and the driver/gunner from one warthog fell out. Otherwise, the goal was to run them over.

You can't do that on 2 or 3 - the warthogs are no longer indestructibe. :mad:

Halo 3 was a little better as far as the single player. But it was the first Halo game I couldn't beat alone on Legendary. I don't see how anyone can get through the sniper levels playing solo. Yes, 4 player coop is doable. Alone is not.

you could probably youtube it. Theres always someone willing to waste an incredible amount of time to beat a video game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I used to play "bumper cars" in multiplayer on Halo CE. The only shooting allowed was from the turret, and that was only allowed after the warthogs collided and the driver/gunner from one warthog fell out. Otherwise, the goal was to run them over.

You can't do that on 2 or 3 - the warthogs are no longer indestructibe.

This was/is one of the best things to do half drunk ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halo 3 was alright in my opinion, but I had an INSANE amount of fun with Halo 2 on xbox live. Before then I had never really competed against other people besides my brother. In fact, (idk how many of you keep up with MLG), my brother and I are responsible for creating the player widely known as IGotUrPistola.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I beat it in 3 days on legendary never really getting stuck anywhere, I found halo 2 to be harder on legendary.

But then again I've also beaten halo: CE on legendary using melée only.

Oh yeah? Well I've beaten all three Halo's on Super Legendary playing with the controller upside down and behind my back.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Halo 3 was alright in my opinion, but I had an INSANE amount of fun with Halo 2 on xbox live. Before then I had never really competed against other people besides my brother. In fact, (idk how many of you keep up with MLG), my brother and I are responsible for creating the player widely known as IGotUrPistola.

Then you my friend, are responsible for creating a Halo God. Pistola is one of the sickest players I've ever seen touch halo. I'm actually really good friends w/ Heinz (since halo 2 came out). It sucks they parted ways, but it happens. I've followed MLG pretty close since 2005/2006ish.

OT: I've followed bungie since Marathon and have always loved their story lines. The halo story gets much more in depth about Master Chief and the Spartan program in the books. They connect you to the characters a hell of a lot better than the games do. The video games really just give the basics of what's going on, the Halo universe is a lot more than what the games show.

I will be playing the Reach beta ASAP and will be first in line to collect my full copy at midnight this fall. I just hope the new rifle fixes the bullet spread that the BR currently has. It's currently a faulty gun in a very competitive game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah. We lived in the same neighborhood back when Halo 2 came out, and my brother and I were better than all of our friends, so Justin (Pistola), who is home-schooled spent almost every waking hour of his life trying to get better than us...which he eventually did. At that point MLG was just starting to catch fire in the gaming world, so we set up a team and absolutely destroyed everyone online. We beat 3D (old Final Boss), Exit Woundz, Carbon, and many others, but we never actually went to an event. Then after a while, my brother and I stopped playing so the team disbanded...and the rest is history for Justin. It sucks knowing I could be making thousands of dollars playing videogames right now, but I enjoy having a life. :D

As for Reach: I'm getting it no doubt, because I think besides the actual gameplay, the storyline is going to be epic (if you know the whole story of Halo).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really? I beat it in 3 days on legendary never really getting stuck anywhere, I found halo 2 to be harder on legendary.

But then again I've also beaten halo: CE on legendary using melée only.

You killed all the Hunters and Flood sperms (don't know what they're really called) with melee on legendary?

Sorry, I've gotta throw the BS flag.

But for the rest of the game, CE really wasn't that bad on Legendary. The hardest part was the drive at the end. But only because the framerate drops so low that it gets hard to maneuver. Challenging, but beatable.

I don't remember much about the Halo 2 campaign. I only played through it once on Legendary. The single player was horrible IMO.

I've gone back through Halo 3 several times for skull purposes. I still can't get past that one sniper level in the woods on Legendary. Its like being killed by the guardians - as soon as you turn a corner, you're dead, no matter what.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I personally think you are trying to talk yourself into circles here... It's ok to say Bryce played incredible the last 5 weeks... I know there are plenty of people on this board who desperately need the doom-and-gloom narrative, but I genuinely question how much NFL QB play some of these people really have watched when they still question him being the unquestioned starter for next year...  Again, that being said, no one is crowning him at all. I think Bryce is one of the best stories going into 2025 bc his season last year was so outlandishly unprecedented. It's totally fair to personally not believe in Bryce. Plenty of sports "journalists" need to write stories, and that's an easy narrative path... But I think that actual people in the know rank Bryce much higher. That's the fun thing about sports... we shall see!
    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
×
×
  • Create New...