Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dan Quinn- Meet the Candidate- Part 5 of 12


ProcessBlue2
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

weird take

As Commanders coach, he's won a playoff game. Cool.

I'm gonna need to see him have a non "28-3" performance in the Super Bowl before I'll be willing to elevate him to the top tier, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

As Commanders coach, he's won a playoff game. Cool.

I'm gonna need to see him have a non "28-3" performance in the Super Bowl before I'll be willing to elevate him to the top tier, though.

Hes made the playoffs in roughly 50% of the seasons he has coached.  He has finished first or second in his division except 1 year.  In the three playoff appearances he has won at least one game and the others a deep run.  If thats not proof he knows what he is doing then thats on you.

But you do your thing hoss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is Quinn the reason they put up 45 on the Lions? Is Quinn the reason they have a rookie phenom QB? Seems similar to the Falcons where the Niners took Shanny and Quinn quickly started looking like Rivera. 
Also I’m pretty sure we were asked to stop bumping these old threads…

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Hes made the playoffs in roughly 50% of the seasons he has coached.  He has finished first or second in his division except 1 year.  In the three playoff appearances he has won at least one game and the others a deep run.  If thats not proof he knows what he is doing then thats on you.

But you do your thing hoss

It's 50% only if you don't count the season where he got fired after an 0-5 start. That, plus the "second place finishes" came with 7-9 records (one 8-8). Yes, he had some playoff wins and that one Super Bowl which is more infamous than famous.

As a six and a half to seven year early career span, that puts him roughly in the same tier as Ron Rivera

That equals "good", arguably on the cusp of "very good" but not "great".

He certainly has a chance to move to a higher tier than that in the future, but I'm not putting him there just yet.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

obviously we have no idea about DC but its fuging wild we had our choice between Vrabel, Harbaugh, and Quinn. You could add Bill B in there as well.   Lets hope this works out

We never had a shot at Harbaugh. Below 0% 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I liked Sanders field reading abilities in general but his ceiling is fairly low and his shenanigans as a pro are, quite frankly, bizarre.  I don't think he is doing himself any favors by being a distraction while also being buried on the depth chart. Don't get me wrong, the media would attempt to make him a distraction regardless but it's not smart to feed into it when you aren't having a role at all. This can also be said of XL, BTW. We are no stranger to this. It's a lot easier to excuse Cam dressing like a deleted scene Harry Potter character at press conferences when he is looking like a man among boys on the football field. 
    • I hear Huddlers throwing things similar about Sanders whenever his name comes up, but to put it bluntly, we don't know that to be true. What we do know is that plenty of Browns fans thought that Sanders had the best camp out of the bunch, notwithstanding not being given the opportunity to play with the ones. What has been reported is that Dillon Gabriel is Stefanski's guy, and Andrew Berry thought that Sanders should be prioritized (even if it meant that he would eventually trade Sanders due to Sanders having more value). The fact that many Browns fans preferred (and prefer now) Sanders, and that there was a split---or difference of opinion between Stefanski and Berry, isn't really up for debate. It's true.  What this all means, at the end of the day, is that we don't know how Sanders compares to Hooker or anyone else because he really hasn't had an opportunity to play for whatever reasons. 
    • I don't think with a roster this bad we should be spamming picks at subpar QB's for development purposes. When the roster is a little more fleshed out, I would fully support that. Also, with our persistent evaluation problems, I can only imagine who we would have likely overdrafted in the past few years.
×
×
  • Create New...