Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Athletic article on GM candidates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Marty Hurney sucks.  But the saddest part is, we could literally upgrade by re-hiring him as GM and Ron Rivera as HC lmao.  How far we have fallen.

we could bring back Ron, Marty and Cam Newton all for 1 season....and win more games than we did this year.   And that's just Cam playing straight read option with Chubba and never passing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, it is pretty useless to talk to me and present an argument that Scott Fitterer should remain employed in Carolina.  I don't disagree with that.   Because it's silly, really. 

So again, what really good GM.....would want to take a job where the really bad GM remains and is retaining a bulk of what is his job? I've yet to here the argument on that.  I have heard how sweet Scott Fitterer is though. 

The only thing I've ever truly seen you argue for is the idea that you know things. Unfortunately, that argument falls apart when you actually talk about them 😄

Now, do you want to actually look at any of the candidates mentioned here or just continue your usual MO of useless b-tching?

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, it is pretty useless to talk to me and present an argument that Scott Fitterer should remain employed in Carolina.  I don't disagree with that.   Because it's silly, really. 

So again, what really good GM.....would want to take a job where the really bad GM remains and is retaining a bulk of what is his job? I've yet to here the argument on that.  I have heard how sweet Scott Fitterer is though. 

 

but casillas, (a random huddler) has 2 not 1 but 2 sources. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

The only thing I've ever truly seen you argue for is the idea that you know things. Unfortunately, that argument falls apart when you actually talk about them 😄

Now, do you want to actually look at any of the candidates mentioned here or just continue your usual MO of useless b-tching?

So....you have no argument.  Gotcha.  You could of just said that.  It's less words. 

I knew Miles Sanders was a bad add and not as billed.  I talked about that a lot. 

I knew the WR corps Scott put together wasn't good enough.  I talked about that a lot. 

I knew the parts we put together didn't fit. I talked about that a lot. 

I knew Bryce was going to play small ball all year, slow WRs and opposing defense would eat it up and sit on our pass game. I talked about that a lot. 

I knew Scott Fitterer was a bad GM and wanted him gone a year ago.  I talked about that a lot. 

Of course, I talked about all that before week 1 ever kicked off. 

Maybe I'm just a lucky guesser.  Which could be true. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Is being well liked in arguably the worst front office in football something that should be valued?

As mentioned, there's way more to the GM job than just personnel and scouting.

What Casillas suggested could happen would do two things...

1) Remove Fitterer from all personnel decisions

2) Free up a new GM to concentrate on personnel without having to worry about the other stuff

That doesn't necessarily sound like a bad idea to me, but you still have to deal with Fitterer being involved in the chicanery that helped get Frank Reich fired.

That, to me, is the tricky part.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

The article doesn't mention Borgonzi but does talk about Brandt Tilis, and it's worth noting that he interviewed with us the last time.

Mind you, the emphasis for this article is mostly on underrated candidates, the people who aren't getting talked about as much.

Borgonzi apparently interviewed twice with us so they saw something they liked but Tilis would be interesting too. I know there isn’t appeal for the Panthers spot if it were to be open but I’m hoping we find someone like Brandon Beane who is great just not known at the moment. 
 

I worry about a retread GM however…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

So....you have no argument.  Gotcha.  You could of just said that.  It's less words. 

I knew Miles Sanders was a bad add and not as billed.  I talked about that a lot. 

I knew the WR corps Scott put together wasn't good enough.  I talked about that a lot. 

I knew the parts we put together didn't fit. I talked about that a lot. 

I knew Bryce was going to play small ball all year, slow WRs and opposing defense would eat it up and sit on our pass game. I talked about that a lot. 

I knew Scott Fitterer was a bad GM and wanted him gone a year ago.  I talked about that a lot. 

Of course, I talked about all that before week 1 ever kicked off. 

Maybe I'm just a lucky guesser.  Which could be true. 

Or you're a guy who takes credit for stuff other people say, while also reframing arguments of those you debate so that they appear to say what they actually didn't, which I've seen some evidence of.

Of course, the next part of your MO is to accuse people of things what you actually do, which I'm guessing probably comes next.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

Borgonzi apparently interviewed twice with us so they saw something they liked but Tilis would be interesting too. I know there isn’t appeal for the Panthers spot if it were to be open but I’m hoping we find someone like Brandon Beane who is great just not known at the moment. 
 

I worry about a retread GM however…

Borgonzi interviewed? I don't remember seeing that.

I know Tilis did but I thought it was only once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Wasn't there previously a sticky post where the mods said they were going to crack down on people sh-tting up threads rather than sticking to the actual topic?

Has that emphasis gone by the wayside now?

Noted.  OP was off to a good start about finding a new GM.  Then folks started sh-tting it up by talking about how actually Scott Fitterer should actually just retain most of his duties as GM.  Which really derails the whole new GM talk. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

Noted.  OP was off to a good start about finding a new GM.  Then folks started sh-tting it up by talking about how actually Scott Fitterer should actually just retain most of his duties as GM.  Which really derails the whole new GM talk. 

The idea was never that Fitterer would stay as a GM co-GM. It was that he'd take an alternate position away from the personnel duties.

The fact that you couldn't comprehend that is where the issues started.

Apparently, Fitterer's name makes you emotional 😄

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
    • Fees nowadays are ridiculous. After purchasing concert tickets for my son’s 18th birthday and paying the rest of our HHI trip with 3 other families, I’m shocked at how much they are. Honestly, it’s grand theft. Some is taxes but in a world where everything is electronic, fees should be cheaper. Electrons don’t cost 10-30% of the event.
×
×
  • Create New...