Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could Michael Vick be Headed Back to the NFC South?


rey2009

Recommended Posts

i don't care anymore. i don't think he's got it anymore and i would rather him not be here but i just don't care enough to argue about it.

congrats on creating a thread that is going to turn into talk about race instead of football, though. it's inevitable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To big of a polar figure to play for the Panthers. But I could see him on the Redskins.

why not? uncapped year...why not try it? peppers, sproles, vick.....they could be the ONLY team in the league this year not concerned with fiscal responsibility (and it still wouldn't matter).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

*** vick!!! I am sick of people shoving ideas down our throats. Moore is our starter if the FO would sign him befrore friday. Moore is our future plan and simple. Vick is a washed up former starter QB. Vick really didn't prove poo last year with the eagles. He throw one TD and did a few wildcat plays and that is it. How is that convincing enough for us to trade are pick him up. He is at best good enough to be 3rd string. So *** Vick once and for all!!!!:mad:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh boy here we go again.... Note to all the people who are soon to flip out over no apparent reason: It's the offseason we are all bored as crap (comes with cheering for one of the most boring- yet stable franchises). That being said I would take Vick for a fifth rounder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i don't care anymore. i don't think he's got it anymore and i would rather him not be here but i just don't care enough to argue about it.

congrats on creating a thread that is going to turn into talk about race instead of football, though. it's inevitable.

dog-joke.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://www.yahoo.com/sports/article/versatile-2nd-db-named-panthers-154026075.html Smith-Wade's ability to play corner, nickel and safety makes him valuable to a young defense trying to rebuild after finishing last in the NFL a year ago. "Chau took advantage of an opportunity,'' coach Dave Canales said. "He made tackles. He had an opportunity on an interception, and he made it.'' Our defense has got to come alive for us to have a chance of winning our Division!
    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
×
×
  • Create New...