Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

best FA Recievers still available...


DynastyRTR

Recommended Posts

that the FO might go after

1-Antonio Bryant-29

2-Lance Moore(tendered-2nd)-27

3-Davone Bess-24(ERFA)

4-Brad Smith-(tendered-2nd)-27

5-Jason Avant(tendered-2nd)-27

6-Courtney Roby(tendered-??)-27

7-Malcom Floyd(tendered-1st)-28

8-Terrell Owens-36

9-Derrick Mason-36

10-Chris Chambers-32

11-Mark Clayton(tendered-2nd)-28

12-Domenik Hixon(tendered 2nd)-25

13-Demetrius Williams(tendered-4th)-27

14-Torry Holt-34

15-Kassim Osgood-30

16-Laveranues Coles-32

17-Antwaan Randle El-31

Davone Bess, Antonio Bryant, or Malcom Floyd is who I would want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait WHAT!? BESS WASN'T TENDERED?

That is the guy that I always said I wanted. I could have sworn Miami would tender him. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE let the Panthers make a move for him. He's an excellent route runner and has outstanding hands. He's kind of like Welker in that he's an awesome possession receiver.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bess is ERFA, so as long as Miami tendered him, no one can touch him.

yes he is an ERFA but miami hasnt tendered him. cant think of a way we could get him unless miami tendered him at a 3rd or 2nd, then we could sign him and they would get our 2nd or 3rd/whatever. he is better than any wr that is going to fall to us at #48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exclusive-Rights Free Agents (ERFA)

An Exclusive-Rights Free Agent is an NFL player who is not under contract, but has only two years of NFL experience. If his former club makes him an offer at the three year veteran minimum salary, then that's it, he has to take it or leave the NFL. These guys have no right to negotiate with other teams. They are "free" only in the sense that they're free to quit.

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yes he is an ERFA but miami hasnt tendered him. cant think of a way we could get him unless miami tendered him at a 3rd or 2nd, then we could sign him and they would get our 2nd or 3rd/whatever. he is better than any wr that is going to fall to us at #48.

we dont have to tender him. he is a ERFA regardless. he plays for the phins this year or doesnt play at all, enless we outright cut him. which we wouldnt do. get him off your wish lists.....hes a dolphin.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...