Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I believe that ALL who ever existed will live in God's Kingdom!


Buckeye Homer
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do you?  

The basis for my belief is based on the scriptures.  I will say that expressing this doctrinal belief has generated a lot of anger against me by many of my Christian brethren, albeit not in this community - yet. 🙂

 

Edited by Buckeye Homer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jesus said "the only way to the Father is through me."

Meaning that all of the Lavitical law and even the decalouge are in fact null and that the only way to salvation is accepting Jesus as your savior.

 

Do you embrace that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Cullenator said:

How about wearing clothing of different materials?

I found the following explanation.

"

Most Christians would agree — the levitical law that wins the prize for weird is Deuteronomy 22:11:

“Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.”

Why on earth did God make such an odd prohibition? I used to roll my eyes at this one.

In its ancient context, though, the law had a perfectly logical reasoning. Both the priestly garments and the tabernacle weavings were a combination of wool and linen. The priest’s white undergarment was linen, and the brightly colored vestment was wool. So it was prohibited for laypersons to dress in the same way."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buckeye Homer said:

I found the following explanation.

"

Most Christians would agree — the levitical law that wins the prize for weird is Deuteronomy 22:11:

“Do not wear clothes of wool and linen woven together.”

Why on earth did God make such an odd prohibition? I used to roll my eyes at this one.

In its ancient context, though, the law had a perfectly logical reasoning. Both the priestly garments and the tabernacle weavings were a combination of wool and linen. The priest’s white undergarment was linen, and the brightly colored vestment was wool. So it was prohibited for laypersons to dress in the same way."

Christians are, by need, experts at picking and choosing rationalizations for what should still be followed and what should not, which most of the time makes their lives a lot easier. 
 

Being gay could be rationalized as easily as this but it’s not.  After all back then people needed to breed more often and earlier because half of them would be dead by 25 or something and they had to have more little Christians back then. We clearly don’t have the need to procreate like that anymore. So why are so many people that consider themselves hardcore Christians not just using the same reasoning? All of a sudden, something we don’t have to fight over anymore!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Buckeye Homer said:

I believe this guy provides a good perspective on some of the commandments regarding "slaves".

 

Who the hell cares it’s a book collected from scraps of other religions and rewritten and reinterpreted by men in power for centuries to adjust to their whims. You want slavery? We gotcha covered. You hate slavery? So do we too! 
 

it’s just a different form of astrology, another con game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Happy Panther said:

I believe if you have to declare your religion loudly I'm probably not interested.

Well, this is a discussion community and management has invited its guests to engage in discussions on a wide variety of topics in this particular sub-forum.  It's my understanding that guests here aren't required to read, let alone respond (as you did), to posts that are of no interest to them.  There are many threads on many discussion forums that don't interest me.  I don't enter into those discussions to announce that I am disinterested in the subject matter.  I try to follow the mantra of "live and let live" but it appears that you don't share that philosophy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, cookinwithgas said:

There’s even a verse about not doing that that’s on the ignore side list lol

It's telling to me that unbelievers become triggered upon seeing/hearing the name of Jesus.  I believe there is a spiritual cause for their aversion.  

Anyway, perhaps nobody here is interested in the topic of this thread and maybe it's better to stick to discussing football.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going to be Sunday afternoon again which sucks.
    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
×
×
  • Create New...