Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canes vs Blues 8pm


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m a fan of the Noesen - Drury - Necas line. Think we should keep that one together (though they had a rough shift a couple minutes ago).

Guentzel - Aho - Jarvis

Svechnikov - Kuznetsov- Teravainen

Martinook - Staal - Fast

Noesen - Drury - Necas

Nadeau - Kotkaniemi - Blake

Slavin - Burns

Skjei - Pesce

Orlov - Chatfield

DeAngelo - Morrow

Andersen

Kochetkov

Martin

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, MillionDollarCam said:

In other news… the Yotes are officially off to SLC.

Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. Still need an arena that can handle hockey. Delta center is 18,000 basketball, 14,000 ice hockey supposedly. But people who went to the last NHL game there said the max seating was actually 10,000 for the exhibition or what ever game was played there. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. Still need an arena that can handle hockey. Delta center is 18,000 basketball, 14,000 ice hockey supposedly. But people who went to the last NHL game there said the max seating was actually 10,000 for the exhibition or what ever game was played there. 

I don’t think that franchise will succeed unless they get new owners.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Anybodyhome said:

BU owned the 1st period against Denver yesterday, then Denver went to a 1-2-2 D and took over the game.

BU played man all night against the highest scoring offense in college.

I mean morrow has been pretty seamless on man so he must have some practice. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MillionDollarCam said:

I don’t think that franchise will succeed unless they get new owners.

Going to Utah would be a new owner. The Utah jazz guy. Current owner sells the team to the league for 1 billion, Utah jazz owner buys it for 1.3 billion. Doesn’t change the fact delta center isn’t built for hockey and it would be the same issue as Arizona. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense to me. Still need an arena that can handle hockey. Delta center is 18,000 basketball, 14,000 ice hockey supposedly. But people who went to the last NHL game there said the max seating was actually 10,000 for the exhibition or what ever game was played there. 

 

Devon Sawa Punk GIF

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Going to Utah would be a new owner. The Utah jazz guy. Current owner sells the team to the league for 1 billion, Utah jazz owner buys it for 1.3 billion. Doesn’t change the fact delta center isn’t built for hockey and it would be the same issue as Arizona. 

But think of all the extra merchandise sales they'll bring in selling magic underpants with this on the front...

image.png.fe98cdd64aecb3af81387489f59b6b6e.png

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...