Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eagles Want Top 42 Pick For McNabb


TylerDurden

Recommended Posts

Wow, I really didn't think it was that close to happening...

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/03/25/1336891/ap-source-eagles-want-a-top-42.html

If we had some actual receivers beside Smitty, I would wonder if they'd take our first for him? I don't think it's worth it though unless a team feels if they upgrade the QB position, that would be the missing piece to take them to a championship...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks at any of their QB's.

Although getting McNabb would probably guarantee us a spot in the playoffs, it would also guarantee us a first round exit as he's crumbles in big games. I'd rather stick with Moore, keep our second rounder, and end all talks of trading for a QB.

Plenty of QB's in free agency that are capable backups.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i'm glad to see that people are starting to realize that matt moore is our guy and that bringing in any other QB at this point in time would be detrimental to our team. i think our guys responded to moore leading the offense last year, and i think that with a little tweaking and lots of practice, our offense will be explosive this season. mcnabb is too close to over the hill for me. he might have three years left in him, and that's pushing it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mcnabb>>>>>>>>>moore

mcnabb has always been the offense in philly. andy reid always goes to the pass happy offense in crunch time and always asked mcnabb to win it for him. he got the the nfc championship, wht, 3 straight years, and 1 SB appearance? give him our running game (something he has never had) and lets see how much better he can be. westbrook was a great back for them and in many ways their mvp (great reciever and returner), but he was not the equal of stewie and dwill together. both backs are not nearly as good as westbrook asa reciever, but between the tackles, both are much more better. here mcnabb would not be required to carry near offense load as philly (still had to get the ball to westrook out of the backfield), he would be option 3 to d will and stewie. i would love to have him for 3 years and 3 playoff appearances.

if we could cobble a decient DL and WR together with mcnabb dont you think we would be the odds on favorite to win not only the nfc south but the nfc race? it would pair the top rushing attack with a top 10 QB (imo top 5), not to mention a top 5 OL. if you want an explosive offense, he would help for sure. WR would still be mainly a 1 man band, but it worked for philly with TO (different scheme i understand). also it not inconcievable a better qb makes the wrs look better (jarrett.....).

that said, it will not happen, the team put a good bit of faith in moore at this point and i doubt they change all of a sudden. while mcnabb right now is a much safer bet, eventually we have to find a long term replacement. moore is the closest we have to that and all mcnabb does is give us a great 2-4 year span, moore could give us 6+ (if we sign him that long). while i think mcnabb takes us from a mid pack offense to top 5, as he can make ave wr look great, moore took us from mid pack to top 10 those last few games. if moore can do that and we can play defense like the last 5 games we got a chance to surprise the league next year at a cheaper cost than mcnabb. if moore flames out we will look like idiots for passing up mcnabb for the short term but we will atleast know we still must find a long term option at qb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I think of bringing in a vet like McNabb... I think to myself that if we are in that kind of need for a QB, there have been much better opportunities to bring someone in who is younger and can build the franchise around...

My only issue is investing a lot into McNabb on the downside of his career doesn't sit comfortably... I would have loved to have him in exchange for the Iggles years...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabb is a great quarterback and will make any team that picks him up better. However, McNabb is aging and past his prime, still demands more money than he is worth because his name exceeds his talent at this point in his career, and is just not a good fit in our system. Sure we would be a better team with him on the roster, but you could say that if T.O. was on our roster too couldn't you? The truth is, us picking up McNabb would be a horrible decision for the Panthers as Moore needs starting time to continue to improve, and we are trying to get younger as a football team. Neither McNabb, nor the Panthers are willing to have a big contract for a backup QB that still has a couple more starting years left. Having McNabb as a starter will be a setback for the future of the Panthers, regardless of how well we do in the first couple years. JR is not about winning now and dealing with stuff later. He wants a consistently good football team and at this point is pretty desperate to get it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

McNabbs contract is too big, no reason to think Richardson would want to take on one of largest contracts in NFL before new agreement. Eagles probably just soon clear their books with his contract by taking a 2nd rounder for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...