Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Dave Tepper would review play call data, review with Reich


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He has won a road playoff game and was down 27.  The kid is going to be just fine

Yeah Lawrence is legit.  Jags aren't doing him any favors and he is still finding success.  I mean who is his best WR this year?  Kirk?  They should be trading to reunite him with Higgins or inquiring about Aiyuk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He has won a road playoff game and was down 27.  The kid is going to be just fine

Yes he's got a couple high points, but many more lows point. His bar was space high and he's average mixed with below average. Jags have won out of spite, even after spending heavy offense. Peterson is a QB guru and he's gotten worse. Jags should bring in legit competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Basbear said:

Yes he's got a couple high points, but many more lows point. His bar was space high and he's average mixed with below average. Jags have won out of spite, even after spending heavy offense. Peterson is a QB guru and he's gotten worse. Jags should bring in legit competition. 

something tells me you havent watched the jags in a while, he is hardly the problem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah Lawrence is legit.  Jags aren't doing him any favors and he is still finding success.  I mean who is his best WR this year?  Kirk?  They should be trading to reunite him with Higgins or inquiring about Aiyuk.

They spent 100+ million on WRs, traded for riley, and got QB guru Doug Peterson. He just not reached the level most thought, he's been too much bad mixed with less good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-G

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-GFirst 48 career starts

Trevor Lawrence- 20-28 W-L 85.5 Pass Rating, 55/35 Pass TD/INT, 12,204 Pass+Rush Yds 6.7 Yards/Att 

Daniel Jones;      19-29 W-L, 85.4 Pass Rating, 55/33 Pass TD/INT, 11,992 Pass+rush Yds, 6.7 Yards/Att

 

Well, well, well........ any comments now??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-G

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-GFirst 48 career starts

Trevor Lawrence- 20-28 W-L 85.5 Pass Rating, 55/35 Pass TD/INT, 12,204 Pass+Rush Yds 6.7 Yards/Att 

Daniel Jones;      19-29 W-L, 85.4 Pass Rating, 55/33 Pass TD/INT, 11,992 Pass+rush Yds, 6.7 Yards/Att

 

Well, well, well........ any comments now??

Now do years 2 and 3 when his head coach wasn't checked out

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Basbear said:

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-G

1737133669800645027?t=ntIvUIMQ9G7ugr_U-GFirst 48 career starts

Trevor Lawrence- 20-28 W-L 85.5 Pass Rating, 55/35 Pass TD/INT, 12,204 Pass+Rush Yds 6.7 Yards/Att 

Daniel Jones;      19-29 W-L, 85.4 Pass Rating, 55/33 Pass TD/INT, 11,992 Pass+rush Yds, 6.7 Yards/Att

 

Well, well, well........ any comments now??

I tend to lean toward your side on the Lawrence debate here.

The one game people have to fall back on is the comeback playoff win but he helped dig that hole. And hey even Daniel Jones had a playoff win where it looked like everything was finally clicking. Then bam.

But regardless. Lawrence is going to likely go on to be an above average QB. Certainly not worth where he was drafted. But I'd rather be saddled with that than arguing about how our own QB is just like Drew Brees despite finishing with one of the worst statistical passing seasons of the last 20 or so odd years. You know we are in the cellar when we're slightly envious of even the fuging Jaguars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Now do years 2 and 3 when his head coach wasn't checked out

That's tevors whole career, like I said some good and some bad, NOT elite. Jones didn't have his team drop 100+ million on WRs and another 40 million on a TE. They just spent another 40 million on a WR this year after all that. 

It's all there if you look at the facts. Its just lots of average at times, poor others, and couple elite. 

I just remember watching two of his games this last year, both were awful even though jags won both. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, frankw said:

I tend to lean toward your side on the Lawrence debate here.

The one game people have to fall back on is the comeback playoff win but he helped dig that hole. And hey even Daniel Jones had a playoff win where it looked like everything was finally clicking. Then bam.

But regardless. Lawrence is going to likely go on to be an above average QB. Certainly not worth where he was drafted. But I'd rather be saddled with that than arguing about how our own QB is just like Drew Brees despite finishing with one of the worst statistical passing seasons of the last 20 or so odd years. You know we are in the cellar when we're slightly envious of even the fuging Jaguars.

He was hailed as the next big thing, no other QB since luck had the hype. Facts are he's been average AT BEST and below average for periods as well. Take away the college orange and 1st overall, I doubt they would have stuck with him that long. 

Plus why haven't the jags gave him the 500 million bag, hmmm...???

I KNOW..... they know what I know!!

Its soooo hard for college fans to see the truth, I get it....

Theres been enough time and just more QBs have played better than him than not. 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Basbear said:

They spent 100+ million on WRs, traded for riley, and got QB guru Doug Peterson. He just not reached the level most thought, he's been too much bad mixed with less good. 

They traded for Ridley a year after he missed the entire year then just let him walk. They paid a lot for WRs, but who is their best one? Which WR from the Jags is Lawrence’s best target?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

They traded for Ridley a year after he missed the entire year then just let him walk. They paid a lot for WRs, but who is their best one? Which WR from the Jags is Lawrence’s best target?

I would say Kirk and honestly Im not a fan of his. But he did have nearly 1,200 yards his first year there. 

I think you said the jags were not doing him favors, but my guy they have spent 200 million on WR&TEs in two years. Even if I wasn't a fan of the names, that's one HUGE favor.

Jags have the same problem as Panthers, no one wants to play for each unless the over-pay is in play. IMO the jags vastly overpaid for those WRs and TE. 

I mean they didn't let ridley walk per say, they waited until the draft comp was a 3rd rather than a 2nd. Once the date happened, titans came in with that insane offer that ridley had to take even after waiting for the jags as a favor. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I would say Kirk and honestly Im not a fan of his. But he did have nearly 1,200 yards his first year there. 

I think you said the jags were not doing him favors, but my guy they have spent 200 million on WR&TEs in two years. Even if I wasn't a fan of the names, that's one HUGE favor.

Jags have the same problem as Panthers, no one wants to play for each unless the over-pay is in play. IMO the jags vastly overpaid for those WRs and TE. 

I mean they didn't let ridley walk per se, they waited unless the draft comp was a 3rd rather than a 2nd. Once the date happened, titans came in with that insane offer that ridley had to take even after waiting for the jags as a favor. 

All teams spend money. They are required to spend a certain amount, so overpaying for mediocre talent doesn’t really help him.  They are rolling with Kirk (who had under 800 yards and 3 TDs), Gabe Davis (under 800 and 7 TDs in a high powered Buffalo offense), and Zay Jones (300 yards and 2 TDs) in year 3 of his rookie year.  Their TE is solid but outside of that there isn’t much to brag about…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It seems the needs for the Panthers are at positions that tend to require intelligence to lift others--going from "good to great"--FS, ILB, and C--as you say. While i like Rodriguez a lot (can see the Hurricanes [Jarvis] and Panthers with a mustache player to get the fans into it)--I also like Golday (WLB?).  However, take a look at smallish Kyle Louis (Pitt).  He is known to be cerebral, but he is small (5'11" I think) and for that, I moved him lower.  But look at the different LB events at the combine--he is near the top in most of them.  I see him as a sleeper.  So if we wait until the second round, we can get a solid LB.   So what if we grab a free agent edge specialist (veteran) for pass situations and help develop Princely.  We draft FS (Oregon) first--maybe trading back to do so--I dunno.  We sign a free agent ILB and draft a rookie like Rodriguez or Louis.  In the third, we could probably find a center, like (former OT Parker from Duke) or Slaughter or Pew (may have to trade up).   So, as you say, others are fighting for Edge players, WRs, and OTs early like seagulls on the beach fighting over spilled corn chips, We sit back, grab intelligent players that make others better.  FS, ILB, and C. OT scares me more that Edge if we do this--but for those screaming for an edge--we have edge players--2 with starting experience who have had some degree of success.  JC Davis can play either T spot and he is good at pass blocking--a bit raw--but could be developmental depth that could play in a pinch. Or you could draft a solid OT with shorter arms that are driving them down into day 3--and convert them to G or C later.  Nijman and BC being re-signed could provide enough to hold down the job until a developmental OT (World, Oregon?) prepares for a shot at it.  Wagner (ND) could play LT but is probably a future RT--he is expected to be drafted early day 3.  My favorite day 3 OT sleeper?  Keagan Trost, Missouri. Great run blocker, soild pass blocker in SEC--just shorter arms.  Maybe a guard down the road, but for the time being, a T.  Not ideal, but at least you are building for the future.  
    • I'm not like most people in this thread in regards to Love. I'm not like most in regards to RBs either. I think certain ones will always be drafted in the first round because they are valued that highly. From an on-the-field perspective, they are as valued as ever; business-wise and contract-wise at times to re-up, that's where things can get tricky with valuation. That being said, Love oozes potential and makes higher-ups' mouths water. I know that he if somehow he is available at 19, he will be considered if not taken. You don't leave that type of talent on the board unless there is another compelling player of arguably equal or more value at another position of need that may have a higher priority (like maybe Sonny Styles). Now all that being said, I  don't realistically see either one of them being there at 19 according to the draftniks.
×
×
  • Create New...