Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

MW2 Multiplayer...


KillerKat

Recommended Posts

Just got this game a couple weeks ago. I must say the multiplayer is much more difficult that the first...or that might be because Im new to these HUGE maps. The only complaint I have about the maps is that they are wide open. Theres hardly any places for cover.

As far as play with others is concerned, I think the new extended range perk of the knife is complete bullsh*t. The guy is 10 yards away from me but he kills me instantly by using his knife. Its hard to tell if im within range of a knife kill now.

Also, I think the 2 weapons that allow you to see heartbeat and body heat should only be kept in one player or cooperative play modes. I think its unfair using them in deathmatches.

Besides the above mentioned, I like everything else. I think the new rewards for kill streaks are awesome. It's just taking me a while to get used to it all. Im lucky if I get an even number of deaths and kills when a match is over. Right now i have 51 more deaths than kills. In the first modern warfare I have over 500 more kills than deaths (which can be higher if I keep playing it because I almost always get more kills than deaths). Hopefully Ill get the hang of it all soon. So far my best match was 17 kills and 3 deaths but thats only cause I was lucky and the other team was half retarded =\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The maps are really pretty small. You just have to get used to them. They are nothing in size compared to Battlefield Bad Company 2.

And yes, a lot of the perks are really gimmicky/annoying. Especially people with RPG, Grenade Launchers, and Akimbo Shotguns. You either have to learn to utilize the gimmicks or get really good without them.

A lot of people are probably going to tell you Modern Warfare 2 sucks and you should get Bad Company 2. While I agree with the latter (BC2 is great) there is nothing wrong with MW2. You should get a good amount of fun out of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont play pc games...overall I do like it, I think I just have to get used to it. The complaints really aren't that much. Just when someone is even a little bit close, I'll learn to do the knife first and shoot 2nd. And find better cover against the heart and heat sensor guns. I paid 35 for it on ebay :) I just got the ps3 in October. The games are expensive, so I wait a couple months for the price to drop on ebay and snag it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope you didnt pay $50 for it. I would have sold you mine for $20

:iagree:

i played it for awhile. then i got so annoyed with the glitches (still have nightmares with akimbo shottys) i just stopped. went back to halo 3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...