Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quite possibly the easiest money of your life can be made betting on the Panthers opponents the rest of the season


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ClawOn said:

A money line at -355?  Nah brah.  The alternate spread for a bigger loss margin is a MUCH better and more potentially profitable idea. 

Do it. The return is much better. The Moneyline bet is just the safest one. Panthers aren’t winning in Denver that is for god damned sure. You can hedge your spread bet with a large money line bet and win either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

You need an app like bet MGM or Fanduel.

The Moneyline bet is a straight win bet and those are the safest because there’s no numbers involved other than wins or losses. Getting into a spread bet and over under bet is more risky but pays better. You could take the Panthers at +8 meaning you think they cover the spread and the Broncos only win by 7 or less. 

Interesting, thank you for taking the time to give me some insight and teaching me a little bit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

One more question just to test if I understand this 

By picking these options,  does this mean I'm picking the Broncos to win by more than 8 points while the total game points scored is less than 43.5?? 

poo. By your explanation I'd have to pick the bottom option for the Broncos to win by more than 8 points.  What does +8 Panthers mean then?  I already picked Broncos to win . So +8 Panthers means the Broncos win by less than 8 points?? 

 

Screenshot_20241021_190916.jpg

Alright so you selected Panthers +8 meaning you are betting on the Panthers to cover the spread, meaning Denver wins by less than 8 points or the Panthers win by any margin. You picked the total score to be under 43.5 points. And I don’t think it’ll let you add a Moneyline bet to this Parlay but you also added the Broncos to win outright. 

Basically you bet on the game being something like 17-14 Broncos win. But if the Panthers win 17-14 you’d still win (if you removed that Broncos money line bet from the Parlay)

Edited by hepcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

That was a very rudimentary explanation, there IS A LOT TO IT. Best to watch a YouTube how too.

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

Oh that wasn't a knock on the explanation bro I DO NOT have the patience to explain it to anyone, I've made a killing betting hockey spreads because of goalie pulls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

Couple of big hits last week, I've made close to 100k since it became legal in NC 

Screenshot_20241022_090351_Gallery.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, staffcurtis said:

I know a few that have won, but know A LOT more that have lost!  Only bet what you can afford to lose PERIOD.  I gamble all the time and know everyday people that lose thousands of dollars, but still bet every week.  Only a drug habit is worse.

Agreed, my "losses are around 20k" which puts my net winnings at about 80k I haven't actually "invested" more than the $100 I used to sign up and get the original bonuses back in March, I do a ton of research hedge my bets in creative ways and use a lot of long shot parlays that 70% of which lose, i place them knowing this and hedge them with variants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Agreed, my "losses are around 20k" which puts my net winnings at about 80k I haven't actually "invested" more than the $100 I used to sign up and get the original bonuses back in March, I do a ton of research hedge my bets in creative ways and use a lot of long shot parlays that 70% of which lose, i place them knowing this and hedge them with variants. 

I cleaned up during the NHL playoffs last season. Made around $7k in profit with $250 cash. Hit a huge parlay in an Oilers/Stars game that paid me out about 70% of those winnings though. But I'm way too busy to be betting on anything other than the Panthers right now which has been STUPID easy money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PantherChris said:

 

 

Oh that wasn't a knock on the explanation bro I DO NOT have the patience to explain it to anyone, I've made a killing betting hockey spreads because of goalie pulls.

And yea man those hockey spreads +/- 1.5 are gold. Over/under and spreads in hockey are way easier to predict in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...