Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Quite possibly the easiest money of your life can be made betting on the Panthers opponents the rest of the season


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, ClawOn said:

A money line at -355?  Nah brah.  The alternate spread for a bigger loss margin is a MUCH better and more potentially profitable idea. 

Do it. The return is much better. The Moneyline bet is just the safest one. Panthers aren’t winning in Denver that is for god damned sure. You can hedge your spread bet with a large money line bet and win either way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, hepcat said:

You need an app like bet MGM or Fanduel.

The Moneyline bet is a straight win bet and those are the safest because there’s no numbers involved other than wins or losses. Getting into a spread bet and over under bet is more risky but pays better. You could take the Panthers at +8 meaning you think they cover the spread and the Broncos only win by 7 or less. 

Interesting, thank you for taking the time to give me some insight and teaching me a little bit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hoenheim said:

One more question just to test if I understand this 

By picking these options,  does this mean I'm picking the Broncos to win by more than 8 points while the total game points scored is less than 43.5?? 

poo. By your explanation I'd have to pick the bottom option for the Broncos to win by more than 8 points.  What does +8 Panthers mean then?  I already picked Broncos to win . So +8 Panthers means the Broncos win by less than 8 points?? 

 

Screenshot_20241021_190916.jpg

Alright so you selected Panthers +8 meaning you are betting on the Panthers to cover the spread, meaning Denver wins by less than 8 points or the Panthers win by any margin. You picked the total score to be under 43.5 points. And I don’t think it’ll let you add a Moneyline bet to this Parlay but you also added the Broncos to win outright. 

Basically you bet on the game being something like 17-14 Broncos win. But if the Panthers win 17-14 you’d still win (if you removed that Broncos money line bet from the Parlay)

Edited by hepcat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

That was a very rudimentary explanation, there IS A LOT TO IT. Best to watch a YouTube how too.

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

Oh that wasn't a knock on the explanation bro I DO NOT have the patience to explain it to anyone, I've made a killing betting hockey spreads because of goalie pulls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, hepcat said:

I don’t have time to explain the various outcomes and odds that sports betting entails and I frankly don’t understand all of it, especially baseball. I will never bet on baseball. Hockey bets are great though 

Couple of big hits last week, I've made close to 100k since it became legal in NC 

Screenshot_20241022_090351_Gallery.jpg

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, staffcurtis said:

I know a few that have won, but know A LOT more that have lost!  Only bet what you can afford to lose PERIOD.  I gamble all the time and know everyday people that lose thousands of dollars, but still bet every week.  Only a drug habit is worse.

Agreed, my "losses are around 20k" which puts my net winnings at about 80k I haven't actually "invested" more than the $100 I used to sign up and get the original bonuses back in March, I do a ton of research hedge my bets in creative ways and use a lot of long shot parlays that 70% of which lose, i place them knowing this and hedge them with variants. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, PantherChris said:

Agreed, my "losses are around 20k" which puts my net winnings at about 80k I haven't actually "invested" more than the $100 I used to sign up and get the original bonuses back in March, I do a ton of research hedge my bets in creative ways and use a lot of long shot parlays that 70% of which lose, i place them knowing this and hedge them with variants. 

I cleaned up during the NHL playoffs last season. Made around $7k in profit with $250 cash. Hit a huge parlay in an Oilers/Stars game that paid me out about 70% of those winnings though. But I'm way too busy to be betting on anything other than the Panthers right now which has been STUPID easy money. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, PantherChris said:

 

 

Oh that wasn't a knock on the explanation bro I DO NOT have the patience to explain it to anyone, I've made a killing betting hockey spreads because of goalie pulls.

And yea man those hockey spreads +/- 1.5 are gold. Over/under and spreads in hockey are way easier to predict in my opinion. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Call me crazy but if you’re in the bottom 7 in efficiency using Zone 84% of the time why not try something else? You paid Jaycee top 5 CB money use him more effectively. Zone is only efficient if you can generate a good pass rush to force a QB into mistakes otherwise you will get picked apart
    • Good Lord this board has become a cesspool of negativity and where fandom becomes something twisted and unrecognizable.  
    • Yeah, I could jump right into the unbelievable Bryce debate now that some people are trying to flip the script because Bryce Young has, at most, a handful of decent games as a pro, but that's going to work itself out. Suffice it to say that I've seen better QBs (with an s) in a Panthers uniform, and I've certainly seen better QBs be drafted while we're playing around with Bryce, one of them who beat the crap out of us already this season... Let's forget about Bryce (and his markedly underwhelming play since he's been here); I think that most sane fans will agree that drafting him was an error, but it happens. Sure, it doesn't happen to the tune of King's ransom---including your main receiver---but it happens. You bet, you lose. Speaking of receivers...and betting and losing... Oh, man, we drafted Xavier Legette. Yes, just like with Bryce, I've entered "the dark side." Some Huddlers were telling us from the beginning, and they were right. But, I'm not apologizing for waiting to see what a guy's got before making my decision on him. X was a one-year wonder at South Carolina who parlayed some really nice production that season, a great personality and thick country accent, into becoming a first round pick (but only in Carolina). For Dan Morgan and company, He was a big swing that has turned into a big whiff (and I can still feel the ill breeze from that one). Sh¡t happens, right? Well, not so fast. Ladd McConkey was the decidedly more polished receiver who was literally ready to hit the ground running as soon as stepping onto the field as a pro. Ladd was never the biggest guy (though not the smallest), but he was the guy that could run routes, always seemed to get open---no question---and had the same speed as X, but with legit quickness and nuanced shake and bake. But Dan chose the project. He chose the guy where the game speed looks more like a tractor trailer than a 5.0 mustang. Look, I've supported X (just like Bryce) many many a day, but no more. Now I'm not saying that I won't root for the guy. Just like with Bryce, he seems like a great kid. But as far as giving excuses for the kid, and, perhaps more importantly, waiting for some miraculous breakout, I'm done with that. I've seen enough. You don't draft a project for a project. And yes, Bryce had proven to be a project after his first season. In my mind, drafting a supposedly number one receiver that needs lots of development for a starting quarterback that needs immediate help to try and further his development is not going to lead to good things. Pick the surest guy. Or at least pick the one who appears to be the surest guy, because picking can be tricky... especially when you're too busy tricking yourself. 
×
×
  • Create New...