Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Too Early to make Superbowl Predictions?


MooreToSmitty

Recommended Posts

Is it? Cause I'm bored waiting for the draft, & I just had a feeling on who will be in the SB this year.

Now, this is in no way backed up by extensive thought, theories, or explanations.

Jets vs. Panthers, Panthers win.

I don't know about the Jets but we are more in line to play Detroit in the toilet bowl at this point. That is if we improve from where we are right now, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sanchez has a step backwards and has a sophomore slump....he will probably be on par w/ the 2009 Jake. Sanchez at points was pretty bad, Jets were lucky to get that far last year. The team itself is awesome....but we know the impact of one man....I actually don't like the Jets as much as some.

I think they are a playoff team....I just don't trust Sanchez in year 2. Too many unknowns, if forced I'd go Colts/Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

i'd never bet against the colts. they make things happen every year regardless of what their team is like. manning is a one man team. there are lots of teams that could make it. predictions are no better than wild guesses. it goes to whichever team shows up to play in the playoffs that day. it largely depends on unpredictable things like turnovers, big plays down the field due to blown coverages, and missed field goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft hasn't even started yet.. and were making SB predictions......

you think a draft pick is gonna have an effect on who is in the SB?

Who in the draft is going to do that? Or are you counting on other moves/trades to have an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don’t think people are saying that picking up the option s a call for the pitchforks. We would have had to do things differently a couple of years back to make declining the option a valid move. We didn’t and here we are. People largely accept that. The patter it adheres to, reinforces the nausea we feel when the idea of an extension, and at top of the market no less, comes up.  One that he hasn’t shown he deserves.   Same as he did not deserve to be drafted 1.1. Look at Pavia and what really is the difference? Bryce is a nice guy and Pavia is an asshole lol. They are both no margin for error non day one talents. One went undrafted.  
    • We hate losing. I don't know Bryce to hate him. His play as a QB, I absolutely hate. It's just not good enough. If there were a lottery held to select the order and all 32 starting QBs could be drafted as the starting QB for whatever team selected them, how long do you think it would be before Bryce's name was called? Top 10, top 20, bottom 8? Think about it.  For me, having never seen back to back games with franchise QB level performance in 3 years tells me what I need to know. We still need to be looking for our solution at QB.     
    • Dude, I'm saying the Cardinals have proven they know nothing. Not saying keeping Bryce is the best choice long term, just saying that we've made the right move for this moment in time.  But man, the Cardinals are never a blueprint for success. Haven't been since they were in Chicago.
×
×
  • Create New...