Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Too Early to make Superbowl Predictions?


MooreToSmitty

Recommended Posts

Is it? Cause I'm bored waiting for the draft, & I just had a feeling on who will be in the SB this year.

Now, this is in no way backed up by extensive thought, theories, or explanations.

Jets vs. Panthers, Panthers win.

I don't know about the Jets but we are more in line to play Detroit in the toilet bowl at this point. That is if we improve from where we are right now, LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If Sanchez has a step backwards and has a sophomore slump....he will probably be on par w/ the 2009 Jake. Sanchez at points was pretty bad, Jets were lucky to get that far last year. The team itself is awesome....but we know the impact of one man....I actually don't like the Jets as much as some.

I think they are a playoff team....I just don't trust Sanchez in year 2. Too many unknowns, if forced I'd go Colts/Saints.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest silver82blade

i'd never bet against the colts. they make things happen every year regardless of what their team is like. manning is a one man team. there are lots of teams that could make it. predictions are no better than wild guesses. it goes to whichever team shows up to play in the playoffs that day. it largely depends on unpredictable things like turnovers, big plays down the field due to blown coverages, and missed field goals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The draft hasn't even started yet.. and were making SB predictions......

you think a draft pick is gonna have an effect on who is in the SB?

Who in the draft is going to do that? Or are you counting on other moves/trades to have an impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
    • He had the award until like the last 8 games. He sucked ass and flagg had 3 40 point games
×
×
  • Create New...