Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Best and worst PFF grades from Panthers' Week 10 win over Giants


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, fanpanther said:

I was curious so looked up a few below is the 49ers from week 10, I did find it interesting herbert for chargers had a 91.6

image.png.07a80565c288843abf9781de0bf2b929.png

PFF sells themselves as being some super objective data based evaluation science but in reality it is extremely subjective and varies significantly based on who there is grading each player. And I don’t believe they really take into account the play calls/design. It’s an interesting piece of information but I still prefer the eye test. Which honestly it does usually sync up with but not always. I think in 2013 they ranked Luke as being average or some nonsense.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, t96 said:

PFF sells themselves as being some super objective data based evaluation science but in reality it is extremely subjective and varies significantly based on who there is grading each player. And I don’t believe they really take into account the play calls/design. It’s an interesting piece of information but I still prefer the eye test. Which honestly it does usually sync up with but not always. I think in 2013 they ranked Luke as being average or some nonsense.

It's still the eye test.  They're just putting a number on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If Mays has a market, which it seems he will, he's gone.  I think we bring back Nijman for too much money to be cautious at LT, Corbett comes back cheap since he's already said he wants to live in CLT, and Christensen eventually gets re-signed with the hopes he can be depth at some point.  Draft an OT, draft a C. The OL might be rough for stretches next year, but time to get some youth there to prepare for Bryce in 2027 or the next QB. I still think we compete for the division in 2026 and can go back to the playoffs unlike the oddsmakers in Vegas, but the *real* year is 2027 IMO. Either Bryce has proven it and he's the QB looking at his 2nd contract, or we have the ready-made team for the next rookie QB or Vet we trade for. 
    • The Panthers are going to have a lot more flexibility in free agency than it looks like at first glance. On paper, the cap space might seem tight, but there are several obvious restructure candidates that could easily free up significant room. Between converting base salaries into signing bonuses and spreading cap hits out over future years, Carolina could realistically clear $60–80 million in additional space if they wanted to be aggressive. That kind of flexibility means they’re not stuck. They can extend key young pieces, add help along the offensive line, upgrade the defense, and still be strategic about value signings. Letting Cade Mays test the market makes sense from a leverage standpoint. If he’s willing to come back on a team-friendly deal, great, continuity on the line matters. But if his market price climbs, the Panthers should absolutely explore upgrades. The point is, this front office isn’t boxed in. With cap maneuvering and smart structuring, they have the ability to be active players in free agency rather than sitting on the sidelines like we are used too. 
×
×
  • Create New...