Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Early NFL offseason chatter


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

I guess Johnson and Glenn have all the time in the world now to choose their next destination. History has shown even after a game like tonight, that usually doesn't affect interest.

Although if both leave, I think Lions fans are going to have a much bigger pill to swallow. Things tend to go bad for teams that has their staff poached away.

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

He's not 60, he's 38 and widely regarded as one of the best offensive minds in the game right now, every team with an opening next year would still want him and put out a feeler to see if there is any interest on his end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Glenn is almost assuredly gone but I think Johnson may stick around. The options this round aren't great, Chicago obviously being the best. But their search is strange and supposedly Johnson also wants to have a say in the GM.

I do think that if Johnson skips this cycle, he will not be a part of as many coaching searches next season. Eventually you say no enough and people will just skip you.

Seeing lots of speculation that Glenn gets the Cowboys job...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tukafan21 said:

He's not 60, he's 38 and widely regarded as one of the best offensive minds in the game right now, every team with an opening next year would still want him and put out a feeler to see if there is any interest on his end.

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Seeing lots of speculation that Glenn gets the Cowboys job...

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

They're only flavors of the month if the offense they run then stops being elite, which I don't see that being the case next year with all the weapons they'll still have there.

The Lions would have to stay healthy on offense and completely tank for him to not be a hot name again next year, can't see it happening.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

But those guys are very flavor of the month, if you skip too many cycles it will eventually get you. Not saying it will happen but it definitely could.

Yeah, that definitely sounds like speculation.

Most of the serious talk has been referencing Glenn or Kellen Moore.

I don't buy the Deion bullsh-t.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Most of the serious talk has been referencing Glenn or Kellen Moore.

I don't buy the Deion bullsh-t.

I think most of these job searches are far less interesting than the sports media is implying. The likely candidate pools are fairly small for most of them. They just need to fill airwaves by drumming up horseshit like Johnson to the Raiders.

Sanders to Dallas is probably similar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That game didn't kill either candidate, but a one and done is not going to help Glenn or Johnson.  Goff going full Goof will be enough of a reason they lost, but the defense was terrible last night.

Kill? No.

But I do wonder if the emotion of yesterday (embodied by Campbell) will encourage Johnson, or possibly even Glenn, to commit to one more year in Detroit.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

That game didn't kill either candidate, but a one and done is not going to help Glenn or Johnson.  Goff going full Goof will be enough of a reason they lost, but the defense was terrible last night.

I mean, no defense in the NFL lost what they have. It's unbelievable they won as many games as they did.

If you ever wanted a better argument against Evero, it would be what Detroit did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'd see him staying more than Glenn.

The Saints, Jets and Cowboys jobs have all been rumored as strong possibilities for Glenn.

Glenn has to take an HC job if offered to him, defensive coordinators can fall off a cliff in regards to HC interest if they have one horrible year.  He's getting a bit of a pass right now because of how banged up that defense is, but if they were to struggle again for a second season, especially if they were healthier, he'd likely lose all interest in him as a HC.

Johnson is the interesting one, as this type of loss, combined with the possibility of getting the HC job of whoever gets the #1 pick next year (and lucks into Arch) could very well be the type of thing to get him to come back to Detroit for one last try.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Today, we are all Kucci... I miss our feral Russian attack goalie!
    • That was a good segment. Watched every minute of it and would highly recommend it to all fans.
    • "So much of what the Panthers are going to do next week isn't dictated by their preference, but by what happens above them. That's another benefit of not getting locked into need. For instance, if you're thinking you want a receiver, seeing five or six of them go off the board and reacting by taking the sixth or seventh off your list instead of the first (or second or third) something else isn't necessarily wise." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-back-into-the-weeds-of-the-nfl-draft-bryce-young-charlotte-hornets-mock-draft This is what some don't seem to get, I don't care how many times it is said: You're NOT going to draft an inferior person at one position, just because that position is perceived as, or is in fact, a bigger need. That would basically nullify, or at least lessen, the reason why you set yourself up via free agency to be able to take the BPA/BAP on the board in the first place.  Yes, the process is complex, very much involved and ongoing, but the overall philosophy is not rocket science. You set yourself up in order not to be pigeonholed into taking a lower graded player at the expense of a higher graded one. This is why Morgan, Gantt and countless of others say the same thing. This is why it's just nonsensical to set yourself in a position where you don't have to, but then act like you have to come hell or high water: "Oh, we have to draft [whatever position], and we can't draft [this position]."  I'm good with whatever they do, until proven otherwise, but even then, you have to be mature enough to know that drafting is an imperfect exercise, filled with hits and misses. And, you generally don't know if you've hit, and especially missed, right away. Moreover, like I've said before, sometimes two players--different positions or not--can both be hits on their respective teams, so in that sense, it's not purely about a right or wrong pick as much as it's about putting puzzle pieces together at the time the best way that you know how.  At the end of the day, people are going to believe what they want to believe, but one thing that's true is that what the Panthers do regarding the draft is dependent upon what others do, and what others do can and does change things. That being the case, it's just another reason why you can't go in with tunnel vision. The thought of doing that is preposterous.
×
×
  • Create New...