Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we keep our picks as we have them....

invisible38833

By invisible38833,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

invisible38833 Newbie

invisible38833

Posted
Posted

2nd round - wr

3rd round - DLine

4th round - QB

6th and 7th round fill in the depth: LB, OL, more DL, another wr, kr, secondary, FB

Right after the draft then I would sign Bulger to bring the veteran in and consider Reed from Buffalo as another WR.

What do you think about this plan? Assuming we keep what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

I can just about promise you we'll use 48 on a DT, unless Tate or someone falls into our lap there.

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

A wise man makes no guarantees. Especially about predicting who the panthers will draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
g5jamz Newbie

g5jamz

Posted
Posted

I look at this like my fantasy drafts...

each pick is conditional and tiered.

2nd round...if Tate, Thomas, and Bryant are gone...BDLPA (d=defensive line)

3rd round...Gilyard...Ford. in that order. If neither, then we go BDLPA again.

4th round...whatever prospective WR is left.

But honestly, knowing our situation and lack of movement in the free agency towards WR, I seriously think we'll get a WR with the 2 or 3rd...but I just hope the 3rd rd prospects aren't reaches in the 2nd. Hopefully we could trade down in the 2nd slightly and still get a Gilyard/Ford AND get a decent DT or DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockyTopVol Collaborator

RockyTopVol

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

That's too bad if you're right. There seem to be some solid DTs available, but they'll be gone by the third round. I'd like to go

2nd - DT

3rd - WR

4th - DE

6th - QB

6th - OLB

7th - BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CanadianCat
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By CanadianCat · Posted

      Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • Panthering
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Panthering · Posted

      This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • tukafan21
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...