Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we keep our picks as we have them....

invisible38833

By invisible38833,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

invisible38833 Newbie

invisible38833

Posted
Posted

2nd round - wr

3rd round - DLine

4th round - QB

6th and 7th round fill in the depth: LB, OL, more DL, another wr, kr, secondary, FB

Right after the draft then I would sign Bulger to bring the veteran in and consider Reed from Buffalo as another WR.

What do you think about this plan? Assuming we keep what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

I can just about promise you we'll use 48 on a DT, unless Tate or someone falls into our lap there.

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

A wise man makes no guarantees. Especially about predicting who the panthers will draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
g5jamz Newbie

g5jamz

Posted
Posted

I look at this like my fantasy drafts...

each pick is conditional and tiered.

2nd round...if Tate, Thomas, and Bryant are gone...BDLPA (d=defensive line)

3rd round...Gilyard...Ford. in that order. If neither, then we go BDLPA again.

4th round...whatever prospective WR is left.

But honestly, knowing our situation and lack of movement in the free agency towards WR, I seriously think we'll get a WR with the 2 or 3rd...but I just hope the 3rd rd prospects aren't reaches in the 2nd. Hopefully we could trade down in the 2nd slightly and still get a Gilyard/Ford AND get a decent DT or DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockyTopVol Collaborator

RockyTopVol

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

That's too bad if you're right. There seem to be some solid DTs available, but they'll be gone by the third round. I'd like to go

2nd - DT

3rd - WR

4th - DE

6th - QB

6th - OLB

7th - BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • jb2288
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By jb2288 · Posted

      So answer the question. Why did Chark and Hurst have the same metrics (go look them up, I did... and one was actually worse in LA) with Justin Herbert? Why did Mingo have the same metrics with Dak? You're right, there is a common denominator, just not the one you're trying to make.  Why could DJ Moore get open with Bridgewater, Allen, Cam 2.0, Darnold, Baker, Williams, Bagent? I'll answer the question for you - because he is a good WR unlike Chark/Hurst/Mingo. 
    • jb2288
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By jb2288 · Posted

      I mean I just don't understand the argument. Baker and Sam both have been pro bowl QBs post their time here. And you just said yourself that is due to him having a damn good roster around him and they are well coached. You're even saying the bad baker is still there somewhere, but he is in a good organization with good roster and coaching that they are getting the best out of him. Why does Baker and Sam get all that benefit of the doubt but when it comes to Bryce it must be a BY9 problem, not an org or team problem?  Hell I got a guy below you arguing with me that Chark/Hurst/Mingo sucked because Bryce wouldn't throw them open. It's ridiculous how far the stretch goes. 
    • CRA
      Josina Anderson: Panthers NOT trading Adam Thielen

      By CRA · Posted

      Correct.  It’s really hard to get open in the NFL when opposing defenses gameplan and cheat coverage/routes on all your players because they know your QB can’t make certain throws/plays.   magically no one that comes to Carolina can get open or make plays with the ball in their hands…..it’s like there is one singular common dominator to it all.  BY makes playing defense way too easy.   NFL players are too good to allow one side to cheat coverage and not respect all the potential threats of a route  so you can dial up a great play.  But if corners and safeties just cheat coverage and know X and Y happening on route/threats….getting open gets hard when they just play it one way.  Getting open has a lot to do with the different threats a WR can pose on a given play.  
×
×
  • Create New...