Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If we keep our picks as we have them....

invisible38833

By invisible38833,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

invisible38833 Newbie

invisible38833

Posted
Posted

2nd round - wr

3rd round - DLine

4th round - QB

6th and 7th round fill in the depth: LB, OL, more DL, another wr, kr, secondary, FB

Right after the draft then I would sign Bulger to bring the veteran in and consider Reed from Buffalo as another WR.

What do you think about this plan? Assuming we keep what we have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Lout Newbie

Lout

Posted
Posted

I can just about promise you we'll use 48 on a DT, unless Tate or someone falls into our lap there.

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jramsey4 Newbie

jramsey4

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

A wise man makes no guarantees. Especially about predicting who the panthers will draft.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
g5jamz Newbie

g5jamz

Posted
Posted

I look at this like my fantasy drafts...

each pick is conditional and tiered.

2nd round...if Tate, Thomas, and Bryant are gone...BDLPA (d=defensive line)

3rd round...Gilyard...Ford. in that order. If neither, then we go BDLPA again.

4th round...whatever prospective WR is left.

But honestly, knowing our situation and lack of movement in the free agency towards WR, I seriously think we'll get a WR with the 2 or 3rd...but I just hope the 3rd rd prospects aren't reaches in the 2nd. Hopefully we could trade down in the 2nd slightly and still get a Gilyard/Ford AND get a decent DT or DE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RockyTopVol Collaborator

RockyTopVol

Posted
Posted

That's funny because I can just about promise we don't take a DT in the entire draft.. let alone our first pick. I can guarantee we don't take a DT with our #48.

That's too bad if you're right. There seem to be some solid DTs available, but they'll be gone by the third round. I'd like to go

2nd - DT

3rd - WR

4th - DE

6th - QB

6th - OLB

7th - BPA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Tr3ach
      Smitty on TMac

      By Tr3ach · Posted

      I think everyone says Mike Evans because of size, but really they have different strengths and play styles.  Tmac is better on intermediate routes and not nearly as good at contested catches. 
    • kungfoodude
      Give Legette another season?

      By kungfoodude · Posted

      At this point, it is criminal to go into the 2026 training camp/OTA's with XL penciled in as a #2 WR. The team must upgrade, either through free agency or the draft. If he cannot give 100% effort on significantly less snaps as a #4-6 WR(players like Tremayne have done that consistently) then I don't think you have a player worth rostering beyond the trade deadline. Offensively, we eventually have to upgrade to an NFL starting caliber C. It's been almost the length of time from Gross to Ikey since Kalil retired and we have below average to terrible C play. Love Mays as a BC-esque utility backup but he will never be an above average long term starting C.  The TE room is one of the worst in the NFL but it's a low usage position in this offense, so the investments are likely to be small, if any. I would never expect to see an elite TE in a Dave Canales offense. 100% agree on OL depth. We actually aren't bad there but BC will be gone, Mays is a UFA, Corbett is a UFA and Zavala has been both injured and bad. We have to bolster that depth again or resign guys like Mays and Corbett to keep that depth somewhat stable.
    • LinvilleGorge
      Maxx Crosby is not happy

      By LinvilleGorge · Posted

      Bingo. The dude is a baller no doubt and I'd love to have him in a vacuum but like you said he's gonna fetch a haul so the only teams it really makes sense for are teams with an overall good roster who they feel an edge rusher like Crosby would out them over the top in terms of competing for SBs. I'd be looking st teams like the Pats, Bucs, Ravens, Seahawks, etc. It wouldn't be shocking to see him moved. He may be more valuable to a rebuilding team in the form of the draft assets he'd fetch than he is on the field. He should still have several more good years in the tank at 28 but by the time the Raiders can reasonably expect to rebuild he's gonna be on the decline.
×
×
  • Create New...