Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys Cut Pacman


JakeFlake

Recommended Posts

I couldn't be an NFL owner. I would always be in trouble with the NFLPA, and probably the league office as well. I've stated for a long time that owners should establish a pay-as-you-play policy. In other words, if you have off the field issues; always getting penalties, having turnovers, getting burned on defense, etc., then your pay should reflect that. You play great- you get great pay. You play like crap- you get crap pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've heard so far (and correct me if I'm wrong);) but it sounds like ESPN could have put themselves on the hook for a big law suit. Because the Outside the lines reporter sought out the guys that Jones got in a fight with, and they said that Jones had set up someone to shoot at them 2 months after he was supsended back in 2007. now I know this is Pack-man we're talking about but 1, These guys didn't say anything till ESPN's reporter talked to them and in my experience with people with a camera in front of they're face some people will say anything to get on TV. 2, this will be almost impossible to prove in court.

If this turns out to be faults and he was infact released because of this story coming out from ESPN they can be held liable and on the hook for at the very least his remaining contract with Dallas.

You can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that's how I'm reading this so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I would say that he's pulling things out of his ass to get people to visit his site.
    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
×
×
  • Create New...