Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cowboys Cut Pacman


JakeFlake

Recommended Posts

I couldn't be an NFL owner. I would always be in trouble with the NFLPA, and probably the league office as well. I've stated for a long time that owners should establish a pay-as-you-play policy. In other words, if you have off the field issues; always getting penalties, having turnovers, getting burned on defense, etc., then your pay should reflect that. You play great- you get great pay. You play like crap- you get crap pay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I've heard so far (and correct me if I'm wrong);) but it sounds like ESPN could have put themselves on the hook for a big law suit. Because the Outside the lines reporter sought out the guys that Jones got in a fight with, and they said that Jones had set up someone to shoot at them 2 months after he was supsended back in 2007. now I know this is Pack-man we're talking about but 1, These guys didn't say anything till ESPN's reporter talked to them and in my experience with people with a camera in front of they're face some people will say anything to get on TV. 2, this will be almost impossible to prove in court.

If this turns out to be faults and he was infact released because of this story coming out from ESPN they can be held liable and on the hook for at the very least his remaining contract with Dallas.

You can correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that's how I'm reading this so far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right, so basically what I said in my first post about this last night. Tepper needs to use that big wallet of his in one of the few ways it can be used in the NFL given the cap.   Give Scourton a bigger signing bonus but not a fully guaranteed deal. Everyone wins in that scenario as if Scourton is smart and hires good money people, he'll take that bigger signing bonus and use it to make more money in the end over the next 4 years than if he just had his fully guaranteed deal and a smaller signing bonus.
    • It is all confusing and layered. SB is the cash you get very soon within weeks or in simple terms, its what you get to sign the paper work. Players and agents can agree on contract but what to "wait" to sign......teams don't like that cause you can "Carlos Boozer" yourself. In order to get that ink dry, while keeping the contract the same, portion it as a bonus to "sign" and get the funds with ________ .   * But Ive seen worded contracts that split the SB or a 20% to a later date. The beans counters can fill in the details about why certain dates are better and save the team money.. Theres tricks to the trade and accounting is full of them.    Ugh another big layer, is SB can be used to manipulate cap and players. Ill try to give a example that makes enough sense. Believe it or not having a owner like Tepper is a cheat code for this. He has cash in hand, where as Mark Davis had problem making pay roll and had to move the team to Vegas....... Tepper can give you 100,000,000 SB right now and the team can spread out the cap hit. Another owner doesn't have or want to give the player 100,000,000 in cash, but offered the same guaranteed contract in roster bonuses fully guaranteed over the next few years........ Which one do you want??? Everyone wants the money now, not before another inflation waves hits in 2 years. So it does 'pay" to have a owner like tepper that's able to have real cash on hand, while it also works GREAT for cap help. Heres a good video, if you can stand coked up pat and mask look-a-like AJ    
×
×
  • Create New...