Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sharper VS. Shiancoe - TWITTER BATTLE ROYALE


Rhys

Recommended Posts

Thought this was interesting: So Darren Sharper is pretty vocal about how he wants to go about shutting down the Vikings come the season opener:

from his Twitter-

Well y'all seen Brett had surgery on that ankle we got after in the championship game. Come Thursday night 1st game. X marks the spot.

I've seen him play on one leg, but not against the WHO DAT nation.

...and Visanthe Shiancoe didn't like this so he posted on his Twitter a message about we also know Sharper had surgery and x marks that spot.

...then Sharper fights back with this classy message:

So visanthe stankoe X marks the spot on me, how bout X marks the spot for how many catches and TDs you'll have come Thursday night. X = zero. If you feeling yourself put your game check on it. No TDs and less than 3 catches you give me your game check. Now whose talking.

So then Shiancoe comes back with this:

Ask your bold D-coordinator to have u check me all game.. we'll see where that "sharper shake" takes you @sharper42. You went for my legs twice in the championship game.. it was mano y mano, I would think that the mighty "Sharper Shaker" wouldnt shy from....... a little thudding

Then NFL network posted a video about it:

http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-network-total-access/09000d5d81861d18/Twitter-trash-talk

Panther news seems slower than ever right now so, this is a little entertaining. Saints players showing their true colors, at least they don't try to hide the fact that they aim to injure players and that their d-coordinator is a slimy piece of sh*t.

I hope the Panthers kick the sh*t out of the Saints, they're inching up towards the team I hate most in our division. God I despise the 'Who Dat Nation' moniker...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every DC wants to injure the opposing teams QB/players. I admire Greg Williams b/c he's at least honest about it.

Basically, you're saying that you admire a guy who coaches his players to take cheap shots out side the rules. Playing up to the limit of the rules is one thing. Bragging about going beyond the limit is another. 15 Yards is not enough of a penalty for that crap. It should be that if his boys pull this "X marks the spot" crap and put favre or any other QB out, Brees sits the same amount of time.

IF it were true that DCs wante3d to injure other players, that would be easy enough to make happen. It's not true in most cases.

\

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing this crap from the Saints last season...combined with the brashness they are bragging about it now, I think Brees' games are numbered this year. Karma is a bitch and I am sure that opposing defenses will be gunning for him.

I would lay wager that he is injured this season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • LOL... Yet again proving you can't look below anything than what you see on the surface Mock drafts ARE NOT draft grades They are what people think will happen.  They are mocking teams taking QB's in the top 5 of the draft because that's just historically how drafts go regardless of the grades on the QBs.  Almost every draft expert, even those mocking QB's going high, have said time and time again that none of these QB's actually grade out as those type of picks. This is again, where I say you don't like to actually read what I have to say, because I already explained it. 2022 the exact same thing happened, mock drafts had guys like Pickett and Willis going in the Top 5 because that's just what teams usually do, but GM's listened to their prospect grades and knew they weren't worth taking that high, so they didn't. It's not to say QB's won't go that high this year, but it's to say that they aren't graded out as elite QB prospects.  Mock drafts 
    • Have you seen the mock drafts lately?   Most of them have us taking a QB. Just because you aren't high on these QBs doesn't mean the Panthers or other teams aren't.   If you want me to be real I just think you a Tmac homer and all you care about is us drafting him. It's why you get so defensive when people mention other prospects.   Be open to other people's ideas. Nobody in this thread is saying anything bad about your boy Tmac. 
    • Oh good lord Interest doesn't mean interest in making a bad trade to take the player, that's why I had such a long post, to accurately describe why those are two different things, but you don't like to listen to that stuff.  Being interested in a player doesn't live in a vacuum. It's very simple... there isn't a #1 draft pick type of grade on any of these QB's, if there was, we'd just take them.  You can't bluff a pick everyone knows you won't make, and trying to trade the pick is the CLEAR signal that you're not taking the QB. Just because the Raiders would have interest, doesn't mean they're going to bail us out of a situation we don't want to be in, they'd be smart about it and just sit put, let us take a non QB as we'd be telling the world we're not taking one just by trying to trade the pick, and then they'd take him at #2 (either with their own pick or by trading less to get that one). Oh, and your point of "if nobody is willing to make the trade, you obviously just take the best QB" is quite literally the dumbest thing I've ever read on here. If nobody is willing to trade up to take the QB, then it's OBVIOUS that the QB isn't worth taking with that pick, so OBVIOUSLY taking the best QB there is just OBVIOUSLY stupid and a bad pick. The moral of it is if there is a QB worth taking, we're taking them and not making the trade.  If there isn't a QB worth taking there, nobody is trading up to #1 to take one, we just showed the NFL how bad of an idea that is 2 years ago, it's really not hard to see. You keep making up this mythical situation where there is a QB who has shown to be worth trading up to #1 for and we'll be able to leverage that into a trade.  But we're the most QB needy team in the league, if we end up with the #1 pick, either we are taking a QB #1 or no QB is going #1 unless we get VERY lucky and two teams in the Top 5 fall in love with one prospect and we can play them off each other and fleece one of them. But again, I can't see that happening, as if there was a QB worthy of that, we're just taking him ourselves.
×
×
  • Create New...