Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could the huddle collectively write better articles than national writers???


Recommended Posts

This thought was floating around in my head the other day. What if somebody were to write up an article, then put it up here to let people read over it and suggest changes.

The downside is that we would probably have to use bleacher report and I know some people hate it.

No matter what the opinion of the article would be we would ALWAYS be more informed than most writers. We are far too knowledgeable.

It would just be really satisfying to read through an article that didn't make any incredibly obvious and embarrassing errors.

We already do this a little bit when somebody posts up a longer posts like position battles and then all the huddlers post their opinions about it. Turn that topic into an article and you would have a far more interesting read than what most national writers fling at you.

One reason I really like this idea is if other teams fans did this we would all be better informed as well. All the ignorance and errors don't only apply to us. There are probably many things I believe that are wrong due to a national writer not knowing what he's talking about.

So what does everybody think?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A select few could.

Some people here are major homers(which I can understand, it IS a Panthers forum..) and the best articles are from an unbiased writer. Not a lot can write an article that is completely objective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This would only work for Panther-related stories of course. The homers would be kept in check by the doom and gloom crew and vice versa. It could work nicely.

Too much work though. I prefer to post irrelevant images like such:

overdosep.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Kinda depends on how factual you want the articles to be. Writing isn't that difficult if you know what to put in the story....

As the storm outside grew louder, the passion Mona was feeling threatened to overcome her completely. Things like this had never happened to her- a poor farm girl from the foothills of Appalachia could barely imagine the wonders she was experiencing. Clutching the sheets tightly, she could barely breathe as the unimaginable was finally happening- Deangelo took the pitch, ran towards the sidelines, and threw effortlessly back across the field to Moore who was streaking downfield.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I love this draft because they picked the right OL.  It is possible that we have 2 rookies starting on the OL.  I would take Utah's Lomu as well, but for those who think you find the OL in free agency and not the draft, here is all I have to say:  We cannot give $110m to the 5 starting OL.  We need an infusion of youth on the OL as well.  If Ickey returns and can play, I imagine that he takes over for Hunt at RG--in 2027 or so.  Currently, our 2 guards and right tackle make up over 20% of the total cap.  We have to add 2 starters, but if Cade Mays was too pricey at around (anticipated) $8m, then we plan to draft a C, it seems. I think we draft an OT and C now because we will need a G or 2 and a RT soon.  While they were good in 2026, they were not elite.  For that kind of $$, we need elite.  Is starting a rookie LT and C ideal?  Nope.  But if we can get better than Nijman and Mays, we should be OK. I think we will pick up an ILB in free agency and add an ILB.  Who we draft (Mike or Will) will depend on who we sign.  Rodriguez is a favorite of mine, but if Golday is there, Morgan is going to take him.  Morgan will love him. I do not think we need to overpopulate the edge position right now because we have 1 edge returning from injury (Jones II), one rookie from last year ready to step up and could be really good (Scourton), and another who could be ready to step into the situational pass rusher role (Princely).  2 hold the edge very well and if we had a situational pass rusher to join Princely, we could be much better. I think rookies at Edge tend to jump considerably from their rookie seasons to years 2 and 3.  (Charles Johnson, Mike Rucker, and Greg Hardy were that way-and all became very good in time. Safety seems omitted, but we shall see.  That could be another free agent acquisition.
    • Id like Evans from Duke in the draft as a shooter for the second unit. And probably a more athletic big to replace all, he's good but doesn't really fit the style. White, Evans, green, Williams and center tbd is a pretty good second unit 
×
×
  • Create New...