Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Taco Bell $2 meals...


Dpantherman

Recommended Posts

Some Taco Bell's just put more poo on the taco. The one on Sugar Creek at 85 is a prime example, always loaded down.

I'd rather spend $2 on 2 Chicken burritos though

Yessir. I like the chicken burritos and the fresco bean burritos. I loved the spicy chicken burritos before they did away with them. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The nastiest Taco Bell I ever had was in Rota, Spain. The chalupas were burnt and served cold. The sprite tasted like watered down club soda. I still had about a seven hour flight left to Iraq, I nearly hurled on the plane. It was either KFC or Taco Bell, either way I look at it I lose.

Note to self: never eat at a popular food chain created in America outside of the country. :idea:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some Taco Bell's just put more poo on the taco. The one on Sugar Creek at 85 is a prime example, always loaded down.

I'd rather spend $2 on 2 Chicken burritos though

Hmmm...is getting killed worth a good Taco Bell? Actually i have stopped there on my way home (its my exit coming 85 s). Dont recall if they loaded me up or not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the last time I watched the Pro Bowl was that year Sean Taylor blew up that poor punter. LOL
    • I don’t go back and look at the espn but there live it definitely said 1 shot 1 goal when it happened. I guess they had not added them yet. Still allowing goals that early is rough. Blue line is a total disaster still. Even with Slavin back. Miller and Nikishin keep making mistakes after mistakes. 
    • I generally disagree with the concept of picking a position because of value early in the draft. For instance, if there's a really good safety, RB or ILB at pick 10, I'm choosing him over a project WR or DE. Better players make the team better. A bunch of ok players will give you an ok team. The number 1 goal of the draft should be to improve the overall talent on the team. Not to fill positions of need.  Deciding beforehand that you're picking a LT in the first or second round because Ickey went down is not the way to improve the team. Now if Dan has similar grades on 2 or 3 players and one happens to be a LT, then yeah go for it. But don't pass on your guy at ILB because you have a gap at LT or need to improve the pass rush with a DE. When those guys don't pan out then you haven't improved your team. But that LB could have been a franchise cornerstone for years to come. See Luke Kuechly and Christian McCaffrey. 
×
×
  • Create New...