Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cars you would die to be caught in...

blackcatgrowl

By blackcatgrowl,
in Huddle Lounge

Recommended Posts

TheSaint Newbie

TheSaint

Posted
Posted

Not sure if any one be able to catch me... but here we go.

ferrari-f60-2009-f1-car.jpg

they veyron would on the straight...but, throw a curve or two in and youre good.

thats not the 2010 btw...lol. You might want the 2010. It holds 250L of fuel compared to 80.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
DirtyMagic97 Newbie

DirtyMagic97

Posted
Posted

they veyron would on the straight...but, throw a curve or two in and youre good.

thats not the 2010 btw...lol. You might want the 2010. It holds 250L of fuel compared to 80.

It would take some time for the Veyron to catch it, and a looong bit of straight. The Veyron would quickly fall behind on the start, but would eventually catch up. I believe its top speed is 253, while most F1 cars can get about 220 at top, and if tuned for top speed probably around 240 or so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Miaoww Newbie

Miaoww

Posted
Posted

Not sure if any one be able to catch me... but here we go.

ferrari-f60-2009-f1-car.jpg

Depends if you're traversing any speed bumps, or loose gravel, or pot holes.

I mean those things are super fast, but man they're fragile. They have to be molly coddled to even start (have to pre-heat the oil before putting it in the engine or else it'll seize up).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • cranky
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By cranky · Posted

      I can't help but think that you are equating physical attributes alone with wins. I don't subscribe to that thought. No one will argue that Young has a strong arm, but he makes up for it in other ways. The real limitation for him is he needs good route runners with great hands. That's why Young was so good at the end of the 24 season. Thielen and Coker were perfect receivers for him and he had his best games with them. Not having them to start the 25 season hurt. Look at the first 10 games in 25 with a rookie receiver and no Coker and then look at the final 7 games with a more experienced rookie and Coker back and there is a telling difference in Young's performance. Prior to week 10, Young had 1 game with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and 6 games with a rating below 90. In the last 7 games with Coker back, Young had 3 games with a QB rating above 100, 2 games with a rating above 90 and only 2 games with a rating below 90. The tools a QB has to work with matter more than their arm strength.  To go back to Darnold and Stafford, yes they both have great arm strength but neither had much success with that alone. As I already pointed out, Stafford, even with a canon for an arm, only had 4 winning seasons in his first 12 years. It was only when he went to the right environment that he had true success.
    • Jens
      Bryce Young 5th year option exercised

      By Jens · Posted

      One more wasted year! ☹️
    • tukafan21
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't love this role for him if I'm being totally honest The pregame show is much more flash than substance and doesn't seem like the right fit for what Luke would bring to the table, and that's his vision of the game. I'd like to see him do something where it more involves him breaking down film and explaining what he's seeing out there, as he sees the game in a way very few ever have.
×
×
  • Create New...